• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Didn't they set stoploss?

Joined
4/21/10
Messages
47
Points
18
A while ago, I read "The Quants: How a New Breed of Math Whizzes Conquered Wall Street and Nearly Destroyed It" and I noticed that there was one chapter talking about when the market was moving against quant strats in 2007. At that time, funds managers had to give order to their trader to manually selloff or deleverage their books. Today, I was in a discussion about stoploss and I recalled of the book.

I am just wondering why did not they set stoploss for their system? In case they did, so why their stoploss was so far apart? I mean the book mentioned that many firms were down 10% and their leverage was more than 10x, so why didnt their stoploss triggered?
 
This was across all their positions. They couldn't just set a global stop loss. Also, if the limits on the stop losses were getting blown through, they would keep missing the trade. Many of them also probably felt that they were losing because others were getting squeezed and being forced to unwind their positions, not because of a fundamental reason. Because of this, many probably were more interested in adding to their positions than in flattening out.
 
Back
Top