Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering.
Learn more
Join!
Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job.
Learn more
Join!
An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models.
Learn more
Join!
Home
Forums
Quant discussion
Computing
Rumor: Windows 8 Set for September Reveal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KaiRu" data-source="post: 55315" data-attributes="member: 5793"><p>Yep, agree about this - I thought you were talking about another level of abstraction.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Lets look at XLib as example of well established API in the Linux world - we have XLib and on top of it we have QT, GTK, Motif etc.</p><p>Lets look at GDI+ as counterpart of XLib from the Windows world - we have GDI+ and top of it we have MFC, WinApi and WinForms with WPF.</p><p></p><p>How does it come that the first case is considered as a well-established API and modular architecture with a good level of abstraction</p><p>(I don't object this description but agree with it) and at the same time on another side the same situation (with different names though) is considered as "I'd say all of this functionality get completely overhauled by each new Windows programming API." (c) ? Since when GTK is overhauled by QT or vice versa?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KaiRu, post: 55315, member: 5793"] Yep, agree about this - I thought you were talking about another level of abstraction. Lets look at XLib as example of well established API in the Linux world - we have XLib and on top of it we have QT, GTK, Motif etc. Lets look at GDI+ as counterpart of XLib from the Windows world - we have GDI+ and top of it we have MFC, WinApi and WinForms with WPF. How does it come that the first case is considered as a well-established API and modular architecture with a good level of abstraction (I don't object this description but agree with it) and at the same time on another side the same situation (with different names though) is considered as "I'd say all of this functionality get completely overhauled by each new Windows programming API." (c) ? Since when GTK is overhauled by QT or vice versa? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant discussion
Computing
Rumor: Windows 8 Set for September Reveal
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top