• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Top 10 hedge fund managers earn over $153bn for investors

billy d

Baruch MFE, Class '11
The top 10 hedge fund managers have earned more than $153bn for their investors since they were founded, a third of the 7,000-strong industry’s returns, latest research shows.
Since they opened, George Soros’s Quantum fund and John Paulson’s Paulson & Co have together made more money than Walt Disney or McDonald’s.

Paulson’s returns – $26.4bn – are only just short of the net income of Boeing since Mr Paulson opened the firm in 1994.
The study by LCH Investments, an investor in hedge funds managed by the Edmond de Rothschild Group, comes as some money managers look more closely at hedge fund returns. Investors typically pile into a fund after strong returns, missing out on the best years.
Rick Sopher, chairman of LCH, said what most of the top funds had in common was that they strictly controlled capital inflows, so that they did not become too big to hurt their strategies.
David Tepper’s Appaloosa Management, for example, has earned investors $12.4bn yet runs only $12.5bn after regular cash returns.
However, several top managers said a lack of market direction was making trading tough.
Louis Bacon, whose Moore Capital came eighth, said multiple smaller countries were influencing the markets as credit worries came to the fore.
“The markets have become like the European Union in that there are so many people that have a seat at the table,” he said. “It waters down the leadership and confuses the focus, causing more commotion than direction.”