- Joined
- 1/9/12
- Messages
- 120
- Points
- 288
Enough said lolI'm currently in MAFN... you should go to CMU.
Rank
|
Program
|
Total Score
|
Peer Score
|
Employed at Graduation (%)
|
Employed at 3 months (%)
|
Base salary
|
Cohort Size
|
Acceptance Rate (%)
|
Tuition
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank
3
🇺🇸
2025
|
Carnegie Mellon University
New York, NY 10005 | Pittsburgh, PA 15213
4.70 star(s)
54 reviews
|
||||||||
🇺🇸
3
2025
|
Carnegie Mellon University
|
93
|
4.2
|
89
|
99
|
136.5K
|
101
|
16.8
|
100.6K
|
Rank
9
🇺🇸
2025
|
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
4.65 star(s)
17 reviews
|
||||||||
🇺🇸
9
2025
|
Columbia University
|
77
|
3.4
|
49
|
75
|
116.4K
|
109
|
22.11
|
98.93K
|
Enough said lolI'm currently in MAFN... you should go to CMU.
Hi all,
I thought this might be a related thread to post my question. I'm an European engineering undergrad and I got admission into CMU MSCF and a couple other top European MFin programs.
My goal is to become a BB trader. Period. No quant, no research, no risk, no nothing. I have already done an internship in S&T, plus an internship in FX risk; both at a BB in Europe.
From a university stand point, I would love to attend CMU (Pitts) because of the American campus life and the NYC opportunity. But I fear that such a highly specialized degree would prevent me from becoming a trader at a BB, because after all, trading itself is not thaaat quantitative. The European MFins place all really well into BB trading, but it would be impossible to go to NYC after that.
My question to CMU MSCF students, graduates and recruiters among the community: how realistic is the goal to become a BB trader upon graduation? I heard that DB/Citi/BNP/UBS actively recruit from the MSCF for their rotational S&T analyst programs, which ultimately can lead to a trading position. But I also heard (from a current student) that getting into that kind of program is very unlikely, as there are only a few spots to be filled by MSCF students each year (like 10-20 positions, and there are 80-90 students).
So the question again: How realistic is the goal to become a BB trader with the MSCF degree?
How cut-throat is the competition in the MSCF program for those positions?
Really appreciate your insights and many thanks in advance.
Can you tell me why?I'm currently in MAFN... you should go to CMU.
According to the director of MSCF, half of the student in this program go to the S & T department in big sell-side banks like JPM, GS. So, I don't think you should worry whether you can get this kind of positions after graduation. Well, my situation is just the opposite, I prefer positions that are more stable cause I am a girl. In addition, I think NY campus will be better for you to get in to BB. I also want to get into BB, but I prefer research or risk positions.
Can you tell me why?
I think MAFN program allow student to choose courses according to their needs and this is a great advantage. Also, I think, if I find my job not satisfying, I could use MAFN degree to apply for phD, right?
Well, never mind. I would like to see opinions about CMU MSCF program so that I could make a wise decision. I talked to several students who has been admitted to CMU this year, and I am surprised to find it is true that Cornell has a lot of students go to the S & T department. But CMU's placement in S & T has decreased.Oh sorry btw for co-using your thread, I thought CMU placement questions might interest you as well, but if you prefer me to start a separate thread then let me know.
Well, never mind. I would like to see opinions about CMU MSCF program so that I could make a wise decision. I talked to several students who has been admitted to CMU this year, and I am surprised to find it is true that Cornell has a lot of students go to the S & T department. But CMU's placement in S & T has decreased.
You are not getting into a decent PhD after working 5 years in the industry. Come back down to reality.But everyone has a different angle. To people who only care about finding jobs, CMU will be the no doubt choice. But I am not sure if I would pursue a phD degree when I worked 2-5 years and find I don't like my job. Also, I care about campus life~
I also wouldn't worry about having less career opps in Pitts than in NYC. The only advantage that people in NYC might have is that they could theoretically set up casual in-person meetings with alums and practitioners; but seriously, who does that? From what I have read and heard from many sources so far: Nobody ever.
what about 2-3 years?You are not getting into a decent PhD after working 5 years in the industry. Come back down to reality.
Your odds might increase by 2.5%.what about 2-3 years?
That's weird, I was under the assumption that work experience in quantitative finance was valued by Finance programs.Your odds might increase by 2.5%.
So, how does it work?
You just hit the nail. "Their worth is hard to measure".This is terribly off-thread but - why is it that risk management is looked upon as inferior to sales/trading? Obviously their worth is hard to measure, unlike a P/L for example. Anything else? Just tradition that has put them lower on the quant-social ladder?
It's probably easier for you to explain how you think it works and then we can "correct" you to the "American style". I think you won't have much of an issue if you're European. It's mostly the Chinese students that have problems.
From my outsider view of Chinese networking, it seems Chinese consider just being formally connected the same as "networking".
For example, someone that never spoke to me, only knew me through a common friend and being in the same program, asked me to edit his very long statement of purpose to PhD programs. He also seemed to expect me to carefully help him plan out his options and strategy for approaching the programs. We never spoke to each other, but the impression I got is that if I were Chinese, I might actually do all this for him for some reason. I don't know why I would but then again I'm not Chinese. This happened to me several times.
As another example, I would often see Chinese students get excited that there was some alumni connection, and then when the alum would show up to meet us, they'd do everything basically to show they were not knowledgable about the industry, lacked passion or real interest, etc., but somehow they thought this alum would go the extra mile to help them get jobs. The idea that they needed to do something to impress him/her seemed to be foreign to them. They seemed to think merely being connected was enough.
Vivid examples. I think this is so because many Chinese students are fresh graduates and lack of resources. So, they try to grab the opportunities, but just in the wrong way~!