Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering.
Learn more
Join!
Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job.
Learn more
Join!
An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models.
Learn more
Join!
Home
Forums
Quant Education
Quant Programs
Columbia MSFE vs MIT MFin vs Yale AM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ccj" data-source="post: 302086" data-attributes="member: 47960"><p>Thank you so much for the elaborated answer!</p><p></p><p>I completely agree with your points about MSFE. As for MIT, I do like its nice balance, connectivity and everything, but I feel it might be more impressive for someone to join right from undergrad's. For me since I'm going back to school after working for a few years, MSFE might be more worth it in comparison. </p><p></p><p>As for Yale, my initial motivation for adding an MBA is to make the program into 2 years (1st year MBA core courses; 2nd year AM) so that I could do a summer internship in between. I feel the standalone AM is a bit too short and I might not be in my best position to land a full time job in buy side right after starting the AM program (given all my previous experiences were in sell side). Another reason why I'm still keeping this MBA in consideration is that it'll probably be the most cost-efficient way for me to ever get a good MBA (in just 1 year and with an extra $40k only given my scholarships). The degree itself, together with the network it offers, might prove to be useful in the long term if I were to advance into management and say, to raise my own fund, etc. I do value the new perspectives that MBA courses can offer and the diversity of the peer group to broaden my horizons and help me grow as a person (all the intangible benefits). I know that the mainstream in US tends to value MBA more than master's (not the case for hedge funds though). Since I plan to stay in the US after graduation, I do want to keep my options open in the long term in the broader area of investment such as impact investing. </p><p></p><p>That being said, I'm concerned about how the buy side (especially hedge funds) would think of an MBA degree and that's why I didn't apply for other MBA programs at all. I understand that they would prefer someone with an engineering degree rather than a business degree. My plan is to take some AM/quant-related courses along with the MBA core courses during my first year so essentially I'll be doing a 2-year AM program along with the MBA - and I will brand myself as such when recruiting. </p><p></p><p>Really appreciate more of your thoughts and suggestions here! Thank you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ccj, post: 302086, member: 47960"] Thank you so much for the elaborated answer! I completely agree with your points about MSFE. As for MIT, I do like its nice balance, connectivity and everything, but I feel it might be more impressive for someone to join right from undergrad's. For me since I'm going back to school after working for a few years, MSFE might be more worth it in comparison. As for Yale, my initial motivation for adding an MBA is to make the program into 2 years (1st year MBA core courses; 2nd year AM) so that I could do a summer internship in between. I feel the standalone AM is a bit too short and I might not be in my best position to land a full time job in buy side right after starting the AM program (given all my previous experiences were in sell side). Another reason why I'm still keeping this MBA in consideration is that it'll probably be the most cost-efficient way for me to ever get a good MBA (in just 1 year and with an extra $40k only given my scholarships). The degree itself, together with the network it offers, might prove to be useful in the long term if I were to advance into management and say, to raise my own fund, etc. I do value the new perspectives that MBA courses can offer and the diversity of the peer group to broaden my horizons and help me grow as a person (all the intangible benefits). I know that the mainstream in US tends to value MBA more than master's (not the case for hedge funds though). Since I plan to stay in the US after graduation, I do want to keep my options open in the long term in the broader area of investment such as impact investing. That being said, I'm concerned about how the buy side (especially hedge funds) would think of an MBA degree and that's why I didn't apply for other MBA programs at all. I understand that they would prefer someone with an engineering degree rather than a business degree. My plan is to take some AM/quant-related courses along with the MBA core courses during my first year so essentially I'll be doing a 2-year AM program along with the MBA - and I will brand myself as such when recruiting. Really appreciate more of your thoughts and suggestions here! Thank you. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant Education
Quant Programs
Columbia MSFE vs MIT MFin vs Yale AM
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top