- Joined
- 1/9/25
- Messages
- 5
- Points
- 1
Hey everyone,
Looking for some advice as I navigate final decisions for Fall 2025. I applied to Columbia’s MFE program but was admitted to the MSOR (Master in Operations Research) program instead. Now I’m debating whether to fully commit or keep waiting for other decisions. While a number of schools on my list haven’t released their results yet, the main question on my mind is whether I should lock in the MSOR offer, or hold out a bit longer for Columbia’s MAFN program and Cornell’s MFE (ORIE)—both of which I’m still waiting on.
I’ve taken some time to go through the MSOR curriculum, and I noticed that two of their tracks offer courses that closely align with what’s taught in Columbia’s MFE program. From that perspective, it seems like I’d still be able to build a solid foundation for a career in quantitative risk. That said, I’m wondering how MSOR actually compares to MAFN and Cornell’s MFE when it comes to recruiting, career preparation, and overall positioning for quant roles—especially in risk or trading.
Would either MAFN or Cornell’s ORIE MFE put me at a noticeable advantage over MSOR, or is the gap smaller than it seems? Any insights on the career outcome of those programs would be hugely appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Admitted:
Waitlisted:
Looking for some advice as I navigate final decisions for Fall 2025. I applied to Columbia’s MFE program but was admitted to the MSOR (Master in Operations Research) program instead. Now I’m debating whether to fully commit or keep waiting for other decisions. While a number of schools on my list haven’t released their results yet, the main question on my mind is whether I should lock in the MSOR offer, or hold out a bit longer for Columbia’s MAFN program and Cornell’s MFE (ORIE)—both of which I’m still waiting on.
I’ve taken some time to go through the MSOR curriculum, and I noticed that two of their tracks offer courses that closely align with what’s taught in Columbia’s MFE program. From that perspective, it seems like I’d still be able to build a solid foundation for a career in quantitative risk. That said, I’m wondering how MSOR actually compares to MAFN and Cornell’s MFE when it comes to recruiting, career preparation, and overall positioning for quant roles—especially in risk or trading.
Would either MAFN or Cornell’s ORIE MFE put me at a noticeable advantage over MSOR, or is the gap smaller than it seems? Any insights on the career outcome of those programs would be hugely appreciated. Thanks in advance!

- Columbia University – MSOR
- University of Southern California – MS in Financial Engineering
- Washington University in St. Louis – MS in Quantitative Finance

- Cornell University – MEng in ORIE