Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering.
Learn more
Join!
Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job.
Learn more
Join!
An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models.
Learn more
Join!
Home
Forums
Quant Education
Quant Programs
DISCUSSION on second rated MFE programs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigbadwolf" data-source="post: 14378" data-attributes="member: 722"><p>If astutely chosen (e.g. MFE), it does "add value." But in the United States, since students have to fund their own undergrad education and professional training, they have to think and act like entrepreneurs marketing themselves, and there's quite a bit of "volatility" in returns. Tends to add to anxiety. Additionally, work across the board is being transferred to lower-cost countries and this shows no sign of abating.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>So would I. But I would have to train the Ph.D., and after training he might be poached by a rival firm. A well-trained MFE will probably require less-on-the-job training (albeit coming with a more limited math skill set). Also, much of the so-called "quant" work is drudgery and doesn't really need a Ph.D. Horses for courses, as the English say.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Those jobs are few and far between. They will tend to go to WASPs with a background of, say, Andover and Harvard. Nepotism and string-pulling is often involved. So if you're a nephew of Bush or Kerry, or your last name is Rockefeller, it will work. It won't work if you're most everyone else, went to Jerkwater High and then Hick State U. Your starting pay will be closer to 50K, maybe even 30K.</p><p> </p><p>That reminds me: if you can, get hold of a copy of C. Northcote Parkinson's "In-laws and Outlaws." The In-laws are those who get married to the Chairman's niece and are subsequently assured of a cosy, senior position. The Outlaws are everyone else, who have to compete on their own merits in a brutually competitive and harshly unfair world. We're all in the second category on this forum: no silver spoon in our mouths.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite16" alt=":cry:" title="Crying :cry:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cry:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigbadwolf, post: 14378, member: 722"] If astutely chosen (e.g. MFE), it does "add value." But in the United States, since students have to fund their own undergrad education and professional training, they have to think and act like entrepreneurs marketing themselves, and there's quite a bit of "volatility" in returns. Tends to add to anxiety. Additionally, work across the board is being transferred to lower-cost countries and this shows no sign of abating. So would I. But I would have to train the Ph.D., and after training he might be poached by a rival firm. A well-trained MFE will probably require less-on-the-job training (albeit coming with a more limited math skill set). Also, much of the so-called "quant" work is drudgery and doesn't really need a Ph.D. Horses for courses, as the English say. Those jobs are few and far between. They will tend to go to WASPs with a background of, say, Andover and Harvard. Nepotism and string-pulling is often involved. So if you're a nephew of Bush or Kerry, or your last name is Rockefeller, it will work. It won't work if you're most everyone else, went to Jerkwater High and then Hick State U. Your starting pay will be closer to 50K, maybe even 30K. That reminds me: if you can, get hold of a copy of C. Northcote Parkinson's "In-laws and Outlaws." The In-laws are those who get married to the Chairman's niece and are subsequently assured of a cosy, senior position. The Outlaws are everyone else, who have to compete on their own merits in a brutually competitive and harshly unfair world. We're all in the second category on this forum: no silver spoon in our mouths.:cry: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant Education
Quant Programs
DISCUSSION on second rated MFE programs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top