Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Please join us via Zoom to learn how the Options course is helpful to graduate studies and interviewing for quant finance internships and full-time roles.
May 16th, 2022 - Information Session - Intuition-Based Options Primer for Financial Engineering Certificate
Home
Forums
Quant Career
Career Advice
FT: Banks cut budget for maths and models as rules change
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vertigo" data-source="post: 177284" data-attributes="member: 25883"><p>you can tell the authors of the article are clueless after reading the first line, i think they are very confused. complicated risk software? that must be the biggest joke in the quant industry. it is well known that all banks have simplistic and crap risk software - limited functionality, bugs, etc. i would call them 'bloated', not 'complex'. there is nothing complicated about a risk model.</p><p></p><p>the authors then replace the phrase 'complex risk models' with 'complex internal models'. risk models are a subset of internal models, but the converse is not true: pricing models, for example, models that calculate the sensitivities (Delta, Vega, etc) internal models but not risk models. whilst this is a minor point, anyone who has worked in a bank would understand the difference between a risk model and an internal model. there are not even the same category.</p><p></p><p>nor do they define which risk models (market risk, credit risk) will be impacted by new regulation. yes, moves in interest rates will be quantified as market risk, but loans could be credit risk too.</p><p></p><p>it is very difficult to run a profitable business under a standardised approach. that is why banks apply for internal model approach. if the authors are trying to convince us that banks will just switch to a standardised approach and cut the budget for internal models, they are living in a fantasy land, where Elvis and Tupac are alive, because that will not happen - banks will push aggressively to keep permission for the internal model approach. there are big budgets allocated to enhance the internal models & standardised models to be consistent with new regulation.</p><p></p><p>i dont think this will detract any PhD students or MFE students from joining banks to work as quants - nor will it lower the demand for banks to employ quantitative focused students. it simply means more work on regulatory aspects, which is a shame because the regulators are clueless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vertigo, post: 177284, member: 25883"] you can tell the authors of the article are clueless after reading the first line, i think they are very confused. complicated risk software? that must be the biggest joke in the quant industry. it is well known that all banks have simplistic and crap risk software - limited functionality, bugs, etc. i would call them 'bloated', not 'complex'. there is nothing complicated about a risk model. the authors then replace the phrase 'complex risk models' with 'complex internal models'. risk models are a subset of internal models, but the converse is not true: pricing models, for example, models that calculate the sensitivities (Delta, Vega, etc) internal models but not risk models. whilst this is a minor point, anyone who has worked in a bank would understand the difference between a risk model and an internal model. there are not even the same category. nor do they define which risk models (market risk, credit risk) will be impacted by new regulation. yes, moves in interest rates will be quantified as market risk, but loans could be credit risk too. it is very difficult to run a profitable business under a standardised approach. that is why banks apply for internal model approach. if the authors are trying to convince us that banks will just switch to a standardised approach and cut the budget for internal models, they are living in a fantasy land, where Elvis and Tupac are alive, because that will not happen - banks will push aggressively to keep permission for the internal model approach. there are big budgets allocated to enhance the internal models & standardised models to be consistent with new regulation. i dont think this will detract any PhD students or MFE students from joining banks to work as quants - nor will it lower the demand for banks to employ quantitative focused students. it simply means more work on regulatory aspects, which is a shame because the regulators are clueless. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant Career
Career Advice
FT: Banks cut budget for maths and models as rules change
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top