Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Please join us via Zoom to learn how the Options course is helpful to graduate studies and interviewing for quant finance internships and full-time roles.
May 16th, 2022 - Information Session - Intuition-Based Options Primer for Financial Engineering Certificate
Home
Forums
Quant Career
Career Advice
FT: Banks cut budget for maths and models as rules change
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phani Sarma" data-source="post: 177326" data-attributes="member: 29092"><p>The article seems paid only, so cant dissect through the details. But agree completely with Vertigo's response here.</p><p></p><p>Standardisation of Models has been a prominent theme, and it would continue to be so. Lots of regulators have now switched to a kind of feedback mode - i,e they look for first set of numbers, and then work on top of it to make further tweaks - with an intention to only make the regulations tougher. As such, they dont seem to have a strict set of policies to be just implemented and be done with. From their perspective, it might be cos they dont want banks to see through and adapt to rigid rules. So they keep the framework flexible and evolving. Which only means, banks for past few yrs have increased emphasis on Reg - Strats.</p><p></p><p>Its a different arguement, if the net $ spent is reduced since they can always have larger teams sitting in Low cost locations and have smaller.specific teams facing respective regulators. May be the article was hinting at this phenomenon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phani Sarma, post: 177326, member: 29092"] The article seems paid only, so cant dissect through the details. But agree completely with Vertigo's response here. Standardisation of Models has been a prominent theme, and it would continue to be so. Lots of regulators have now switched to a kind of feedback mode - i,e they look for first set of numbers, and then work on top of it to make further tweaks - with an intention to only make the regulations tougher. As such, they dont seem to have a strict set of policies to be just implemented and be done with. From their perspective, it might be cos they dont want banks to see through and adapt to rigid rules. So they keep the framework flexible and evolving. Which only means, banks for past few yrs have increased emphasis on Reg - Strats. Its a different arguement, if the net $ spent is reduced since they can always have larger teams sitting in Low cost locations and have smaller.specific teams facing respective regulators. May be the article was hinting at this phenomenon. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant Career
Career Advice
FT: Banks cut budget for maths and models as rules change
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top