- Joined
- 9/9/24
- Messages
- 4
- Points
- 3
My main consideration is it seems quant finance masters require you to have done real analysis. This isn't something that I have not done in any formal academic capacity.
I am happy soughting experience in real analysis indepdently, but my consideration then is how I can translate this independent learning into something that has substance on an application when compared to students who have specifically studied and been assessed on it at university?
However, programs such as MSc Quantitative Finance at ETH Zurich do say they are open to engineers - and I didn't realise real analysis was even studied in any engineering discipline. I wonder though whether this is just my ignorance and some engineering disciplines do indeed include real analysis, and chemical engineering just wouldn't be included in eligible engineering degrees? Or, whether an academic background in real analysis has less weighting than I currently consider it has?
This all leaves me quite confused as to whether I am even eligible to for a quantitative finance masters with this gap in real analysis? Confused especially since other engineers must surely be in the same boat? Any recommendations on how I can possibly bridge this gab in a credible way independently.
TL;DR: Ultimately, my question is - is real analysis the bottleneck to quantitative finance programs that I think it is? A
I am happy soughting experience in real analysis indepdently, but my consideration then is how I can translate this independent learning into something that has substance on an application when compared to students who have specifically studied and been assessed on it at university?
However, programs such as MSc Quantitative Finance at ETH Zurich do say they are open to engineers - and I didn't realise real analysis was even studied in any engineering discipline. I wonder though whether this is just my ignorance and some engineering disciplines do indeed include real analysis, and chemical engineering just wouldn't be included in eligible engineering degrees? Or, whether an academic background in real analysis has less weighting than I currently consider it has?
This all leaves me quite confused as to whether I am even eligible to for a quantitative finance masters with this gap in real analysis? Confused especially since other engineers must surely be in the same boat? Any recommendations on how I can possibly bridge this gab in a credible way independently.
TL;DR: Ultimately, my question is - is real analysis the bottleneck to quantitative finance programs that I think it is? A