a kid from a decent undergrad with a good GPA and decent dataset-wrangling experience can do the job
as someone who fits this profile and works at a smaller asset manager now (life is good) after moving from a big name buy-side firm, i’m going to have an unpopular opinion here and say ask yourself if:
offers from the large sell-side firms and a couple big-name buy-side firms before Christmas. The quantity of these positions is not that large (probably <100 positions spread across the banks, hedge funds, prop trading firms, other asset managers targeting financial engineering students)
is what you really want (personally, i kind of doubt it at this point), grass always greener on the other side. they will expect a lot from you and despite the high comp, the ratio of your comp vs what you generate for the firm will be very low. you will be worked to the bone, and even if it’s 8-9 hours a day at the ones that care about balance, you will still be mentally exhausted from being at 90+% capacity the whole day. and if you’re not good, you will be gone in 3-6 months, i've seen it happen. doesnt matter how good you are at interviewing.
the putnam winners, ivy league prestige grads, hotshot phds, top percentile of mfe, etc. who line the halls of citadel, DE shaw (cannot think of a more fitting example of everything below...), GS, etc. are balls of anxiety and despite the incredible level of specialized ability, lack the critical thinking to, say, realize that the played-up high level math that people on the outside think quants constantly utilize can be just used for political reasons such as luring investors. see: dilbert comics, ironically written by an MBA...
i think
@bigbadwolf can back me up on this