• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Options on interest rates futures

  • Thread starter Thread starter alafm
  • Start date Start date
Joined
2/10/13
Messages
3
Points
11
Hello,

I have a question regarding the pricing and the hedging of options on Interest rates futures in Bloomberg. I don't really understand how the values are obtained by using the Normal model and the convention ( call on futures <=> put on the underlying).

Let's say I have an option on ERU3 Comdty:

Futures price = 99.583
strike = 100;
Time to expiry = 221 days
Implied volatility = 37.487 %;
risk Free rate = 0.398%

From bloomberg I have the following results (see the attached file):

price = 0.01
delta = 7.72%
gamma = 0.2054%
Vega = 2.62
Theta = - 0.22
Rho = -1.75

I am trying to get the same results from Matlab using the Black Model but it does not fit:

call = 0.4071;
put = 0;
delta = 0.97

And I could not find the right implied volatily by reversing the Black Model
Could someone explain carefully the formulae to use to obtain the right values?
I spent a lot of days on this issue..

Many thanks,
 

Attachments

  • test.webp
    test.webp
    39.6 KB · Views: 14
by the no-arbitrage pricing, the cash you paid for the call and futures should be the same value as you sold the put and current stock.

i see you are trying to price an american call. by the black model why you want to find the implied volatility?
it's a little bit tricky for american calls, you would need to find the current prices of the underlying stock first for each binomial step. then get the intrinsic value of the call.

http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/fedc_homepage/xplore/tutorials/xlghtmlnode62.html
 
Thank you for your answer Keith Tan.
I want to express the implied volatility in my example just for training, it is like a second exercise.
I had a look at your link. You are right about the relationship between the put on current stock and the call on futures, this is what I have tried to use in my first message. Do you have any idea of why the values dont match?

Thank you
 
can't really translate much from the pic. i suppose the prices on bloomberg are live trading prices?

hint: press F1 2 times
 
Just to give you a feedback. The model used in the screenshot is the Black Normal Model... That is why I could not find the right values by using the Black Scholes model...

Thank you
 
Back
Top