Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2021 Rankings
2021 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering.
Learn more
Join!
Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job.
Learn more
Join!
An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models.
Learn more
Join!
Home
Articles
Our best traders spend a lot of their time pounding away writing code
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Duffy" data-source="post: 118184" data-attributes="member: 607"><p>I agree with you - speaking as a Fortran IV programmer and later from the late 70s' - that Fortran is a great language. I loved doing Fortran code. It might even be better than C++ for computational finance.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, that's neither here not there in the current environment.</p><p></p><p>I worked with Medusa CAD in the 80s and even then the port Fortran -> C was made.</p><p></p><p>I have met almost no one the last while who does Fortran. We can agree to disagree but C++ on your CV >> Fortran on CV (for good or bad, hard to say). Once OP gets out of university I fear not many people will be interested in Fortran knowledge.</p><p></p><p>Maybe academia could embrace hard C++ (it's worth it) instead of 1) sticking to Fortran or 2) easier options like Java.</p><p></p><p><em>This picture of Fortran as dead language, that people tend to have, is rather wrong</em></p><p>OK. Please can you give some high-profile cases (outside academia and government)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel Duffy, post: 118184, member: 607"] I agree with you - speaking as a Fortran IV programmer and later from the late 70s' - that Fortran is a great language. I loved doing Fortran code. It might even be better than C++ for computational finance. Unfortunately, that's neither here not there in the current environment. I worked with Medusa CAD in the 80s and even then the port Fortran -> C was made. I have met almost no one the last while who does Fortran. We can agree to disagree but C++ on your CV >> Fortran on CV (for good or bad, hard to say). Once OP gets out of university I fear not many people will be interested in Fortran knowledge. Maybe academia could embrace hard C++ (it's worth it) instead of 1) sticking to Fortran or 2) easier options like Java. [I]This picture of Fortran as dead language, that people tend to have, is rather wrong[/I] OK. Please can you give some high-profile cases (outside academia and government)? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Articles
Our best traders spend a lot of their time pounding away writing code
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top