Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering.
Learn more
Join!
Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job.
Learn more
Join!
An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models.
Learn more
Join!
Home
Forums
Quant discussion
Quant Matters
Paul Wilmott: most quants are stupid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="psuhoops" data-source="post: 88590" data-attributes="member: 2937"><p>Here's my take: Demand for bespoke derivative products will continue to decline as the demand for transparency from the banks increases along with liquidity demands from investors will reduce demand for MFEs in this area. Hedge funds and some prop trading areas already hire Undergrad Comp Sci majors to do programming tasks much cheaper than an MFE; the cost savings vs hiring an MFE with no market experience should ensure this continues. Research into areas such as fractals and development of new models that better describe the market seem to be very limited; the continuing "refurbishing" of flawed stochastic models and emphasis on theory vs practical as many mentioned above results in the need for the MFE grad with no experience to learn how the market and finance actually works. </p><p> </p><p>The above sound very negative; for those with no experience in the market and little or no understanding of finance and/or economics I believe getting an MFE is not a great decision. I would recommend first getting a job in finance; both to see whether you actually like the subject and to learn the basics. After working for a few years, with a realistic idea of what may be possible future positions, then a MFE may be an option; however, a CFA or MBA might be a better choice as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="psuhoops, post: 88590, member: 2937"] Here's my take: Demand for bespoke derivative products will continue to decline as the demand for transparency from the banks increases along with liquidity demands from investors will reduce demand for MFEs in this area. Hedge funds and some prop trading areas already hire Undergrad Comp Sci majors to do programming tasks much cheaper than an MFE; the cost savings vs hiring an MFE with no market experience should ensure this continues. Research into areas such as fractals and development of new models that better describe the market seem to be very limited; the continuing "refurbishing" of flawed stochastic models and emphasis on theory vs practical as many mentioned above results in the need for the MFE grad with no experience to learn how the market and finance actually works. The above sound very negative; for those with no experience in the market and little or no understanding of finance and/or economics I believe getting an MFE is not a great decision. I would recommend first getting a job in finance; both to see whether you actually like the subject and to learn the basics. After working for a few years, with a realistic idea of what may be possible future positions, then a MFE may be an option; however, a CFA or MBA might be a better choice as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant discussion
Quant Matters
Paul Wilmott: most quants are stupid
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top