Hi,
I am a 4th year undergrad at UCB studying Applied Math and Econ. I got offers from UCB and Columbia's MFE programs, had my interview with MIT rescheduled for this week, and have not gotten interview requests from CMU or Princeton yet, so I assume the latter two I am not getting into. I have interests in ML and algo trading so I would prefer to end up on the buy-side as a quant trader/researcher at a top prop shop or hedge fund (Two Sigma, Citadel, HRT, Jane Street, Optiver, etc.) rather than quant work at a big bank. I am trying to decide between my above options and am heavily leaning toward UCB at the moment due to the small cohort, emphasis on tech that can allow me to do DS in case quant doesn't work out, and the top-notch career services provided (I hear considerably better than Columbia, Princeton, MIT, and CMU). My only reservations are that I spent 4 years at Berkeley and it might be best to explore another environment, perhaps one closer to NYC to help with recruitment due to proximity. Also, the start date being in March means I would likely take on a part-time job or internship in the fall and then enter the workforce later than other programs. In examining Columbia's program, my initial takeaway was that it had a more flexible curriculum w/ more ML and DL than UCB but far worse placement in my desired industry (prop trading). I would love to know what you all think about my options given my desire to go into quant trading at a big shop. And despite it being a long shot given I haven't gotten an interview yet, would Princeton or CMU offer better career placement in this industry or even MIT? I've heard bad things about MIT's program due to shoddy career services but the prestige of the school is undeniable. Thanks!
I am a 4th year undergrad at UCB studying Applied Math and Econ. I got offers from UCB and Columbia's MFE programs, had my interview with MIT rescheduled for this week, and have not gotten interview requests from CMU or Princeton yet, so I assume the latter two I am not getting into. I have interests in ML and algo trading so I would prefer to end up on the buy-side as a quant trader/researcher at a top prop shop or hedge fund (Two Sigma, Citadel, HRT, Jane Street, Optiver, etc.) rather than quant work at a big bank. I am trying to decide between my above options and am heavily leaning toward UCB at the moment due to the small cohort, emphasis on tech that can allow me to do DS in case quant doesn't work out, and the top-notch career services provided (I hear considerably better than Columbia, Princeton, MIT, and CMU). My only reservations are that I spent 4 years at Berkeley and it might be best to explore another environment, perhaps one closer to NYC to help with recruitment due to proximity. Also, the start date being in March means I would likely take on a part-time job or internship in the fall and then enter the workforce later than other programs. In examining Columbia's program, my initial takeaway was that it had a more flexible curriculum w/ more ML and DL than UCB but far worse placement in my desired industry (prop trading). I would love to know what you all think about my options given my desire to go into quant trading at a big shop. And despite it being a long shot given I haven't gotten an interview yet, would Princeton or CMU offer better career placement in this industry or even MIT? I've heard bad things about MIT's program due to shoddy career services but the prestige of the school is undeniable. Thanks!
