Hi ya'll,
I've got a decision on my hands. So I thought of coming here for some quick opinions. Background is top 5 ivy league school, bachelors in math and 3 years quant developer at 250m hedge fund, quant equity, London. Work is mixture of implementation and strategy.
So ideally, in six years time, I want to be a portfolio manager with my team of analysts. Yeah, call me ambitious, too greedy, whatever. It's good to have goals right.
Right now, I have an offer to a 800m hedge fund, also quant equity, back at New York. AUM is an upgrade and company is one of those reputable and branded funds housed in a larger fund of funds. Issue is that my role is still quant dev / analyst, and pretty much start off implementation with sprinkles of strategy involvement.
I know that for one to reach PM, he should 1) have MSc or PhD and / or 2) stay away from the development implementation track.
Questions:
1. Should I take up the NY offer? Barring my ambitions for a PM, it's a natural yes. It is an upgrade from where I am. Can learn more, earn more, more experience. But I've heard chances to go from dev to PM is slim, though much higher compared when someone not even in a quant fund.
2. Would sticking with my current gig and attempt for a Masters in Finance (MIT/Princeton/Stanford) be a better choice if I want to go PM? I eventually need to upgrade education wise so maybe do it now?
Thoughts?
Phil
I've got a decision on my hands. So I thought of coming here for some quick opinions. Background is top 5 ivy league school, bachelors in math and 3 years quant developer at 250m hedge fund, quant equity, London. Work is mixture of implementation and strategy.
So ideally, in six years time, I want to be a portfolio manager with my team of analysts. Yeah, call me ambitious, too greedy, whatever. It's good to have goals right.
Right now, I have an offer to a 800m hedge fund, also quant equity, back at New York. AUM is an upgrade and company is one of those reputable and branded funds housed in a larger fund of funds. Issue is that my role is still quant dev / analyst, and pretty much start off implementation with sprinkles of strategy involvement.
I know that for one to reach PM, he should 1) have MSc or PhD and / or 2) stay away from the development implementation track.
Questions:
1. Should I take up the NY offer? Barring my ambitions for a PM, it's a natural yes. It is an upgrade from where I am. Can learn more, earn more, more experience. But I've heard chances to go from dev to PM is slim, though much higher compared when someone not even in a quant fund.
2. Would sticking with my current gig and attempt for a Masters in Finance (MIT/Princeton/Stanford) be a better choice if I want to go PM? I eventually need to upgrade education wise so maybe do it now?
Thoughts?
Phil