Why do more people go towards MS CS instead of MFE

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuraV
  • Start date Start date
Joined
12/4/24
Messages
13
Points
1
While both fields are equally lucrative and 'competitive', I was wondering why fewer people attempt to get a MFE while a vast number of people go into MS CS every year. Does this have to do with the pay, mathematical background necessary, or etc?
 
Easier requirements to get admitted into MS CS. Broader appeal while MFE is a niche and little known degree.
Even though it is lesser known, would you say it is worth it to pursue rather than going into the common MS CS?
 
I have both and the MFE degree set me up for my career in finance. I did it in the mid 2000s where quants were not a trend on social media.
Hard to give a definite answer since lots have changed. AI may make CS an obsolete degree in the future. At the same time, there are ways more MFE graduates these days and many of them couldn't secure a job. For every quant job, there is a thousands applicants. That's the odd you have to keep in mind.
 
I have both and the MFE degree set me up for my career in finance. I did it in the mid 2000s where quants were not a trend on social media.
Hard to give a definite answer since lots have changed. AI may make CS an obsolete degree in the future. At the same time, there are ways more MFE graduates these days and many of them couldn't secure a job. For every quant job, there is a thousands applicants. That's the odd you have to keep in mind.
By the same token, isn't it the same odds of landing a CS role in FAANG? Also, if I land a MFE at a decent college like Georgia Tech, won't I have a minimum guarantee role from which I can work upwards?
 
If you have a realistic expectation for job profile that matches your profile and get into programs with demonstrably career placement in those roles, it's a good call.
Example, if you are interested in quantitative risk roles, NCSU has good record placing graduates in banks in Charlotte area. It will be an example of knowing what you want and finding a programs that deliver.
If you aim for a quant trader, quant researcher roles at a prestigious firms (Jane Street, Citadel, etc), very few graduates will get those roles. You have to be extraordinary.
It all comes down to knowing yourself, what you can excel and optimize the path.
 
If you have a realistic expectation for job profile that matches your profile and get into programs with demonstrably career placement in those roles, it's a good call.
Example, if you are interested in quantitative risk roles, NCSU has good record placing graduates in banks in Charlotte area. It will be an example of knowing what you want and finding a programs that deliver.
If you aim for a quant trader, quant researcher roles at a prestigious firms (Jane Street, Citadel, etc), very few graduates will get those roles. You have to be extraordinary.
It all comes down to knowing yourself, what you can excel and optimize the path.
For quantitative risk roles, what are the salary prospects through the career; it is possible to get 250k+ salary 5 years down the road.

Also, aside from quant trading/research, what other roles are 'easier' to aquire with MFE, like quant risk roles?
 
Quant dev, fintech, any roles where compensation is not tied directly to PnL.
 
Quant dev, fintech, any roles where compensation is not tied directly to PnL.
To become qjuantdev, would you suggest getting MS CS or MFe in a school that emphasize cs/fintech
 
Back
Top Bottom