- Joined
- 4/4/25
- Messages
- 1
- Points
- 3
Hi everyone, I’m an international student with a background in Economics & Mathematics, and I’m struggling to decide between the University of Chicago Booth’s Master in Finance and Yale’s MA in Asset Management. Would love to get your thoughts!
Here’s my breakdown:
Thanks so much in advance!
Here’s my breakdown:
Booth MiF (15-month program)
Pros:- Covers both primary and secondary markets (good breadth of exposure).
- As a brand-new program from an M7 school, Booth might be investing extra resources to build a strong reputation.
- This year’s application process was quite competitive, which may signal booth is aiming high?
- I've heard some whispers about tension or a sense of elitism from MBA students toward master’s students at Booth.
- Large class size = more competition for career resources and networking.
- No employment report yet since it’s a new program = higher uncertainty.
Yale AM (9-month program)
Pros:- Strong Yale brand name and decent placement results historically.
- Program is more quant-focused and targeted toward secondary markets, which might give an edge for asset management or hedge fund roles.
- Much smaller class size = more individualized career support and faculty attention.
- Not an M7, so perception in finance circles might not be as strong as Booth.
- Only 9 months — feels rushed, especially for job hunting.
- I’ve noticed their placement results have dipped a bit in recent years.
What I care about:
- I’m not interested in IBD roles.
- Really hoping to stay in the U.S. or work in Hong Kong post-graduation.
- I value brand prestige, career support, and long-term salary growth potential.
Thanks so much in advance!