- Headline
- Great course but need some clean up
The course provides good practices in C++11 syntax.
Avi and GONG are great TAs. They are responsive, concise, straight to the point, and willing to help. I found the forum very useful especially the comments from the two. They are true assets to this course and should get a raise :)
Suggestions
Rephrasing of the exercise questions to give more clear statements would be beneficial from a student perspective. I agree that "understanding the question" is part of the exercise, and that "broad, open-ended questions provide more flexibility and better exercise". However, the situation is that those questions may not seem ambiguous from one who creates the exercise and knows the answer, but it indeed has several valid interpretations and most of them are not what is intended. Those "request for clarification" raised in the forum provides a good list of examples.
I think the questions should be stand-alone without the addition from the forum. However, I find myself spending about 30% of time just to figure out what is the intended requirement. Other students usually needs the same clarification in the forum. This process provides little C++ practice and does not serve the goal of this course. I believe it will benefit the future students by rephrasing some confusing question statements.