- Headline
- The MSFE program at Claremont offers excellent faculty and personalized attention in key finance courses but could improve by integrating practical applications in its math curriculum and providing stronger career support for Quant Finance students.
- Class of
- 2023
As a recent graduate of the MSFE program at Claremont, I’d rate the program as average, but with areas for improvement. Over time, the class sizes have shrunk significantly. When I attended, it was during the pandemic, and about 60% of my classes were online. This, unfortunately, limited my exposure to the full master’s experience that I would have expected from a traditional on-campus program.
That said, several courses stood out as excellent. Classes like Asset Management, Introduction to Risk, Time Series, and Corporate Finance were well-structured with outstanding faculty members who made complex topics engaging and relevant. The professors were highly knowledgeable, and I appreciated how they applied real-world scenarios to these subjects. However, some of the more math-focused courses felt overly theoretical. I believe that if there had been more emphasis on how these mathematical concepts are used in the industry, the program would have been more impactful for those pursuing careers in Quantitative Finance. Integrating practical applications of these skills would significantly enhance the educational structure.
One advantage of a smaller class size was the opportunity for individual attention from professors. With fewer students, the professors were able to offer more personalized guidance, which was beneficial for deep learning and interaction. It was particularly helpful in courses where hands-on feedback and engagement made a difference.
On the downside, I found the career services to be lacking, especially in terms of support for those aiming for a career in Quant Finance. The career office, at the time of my attendance, wasn’t as helpful as I had hoped. I had to rely heavily on self-directed efforts to find internships and job opportunities relevant to my field. While the career office might offer general advice, I found that they lacked the expertise in Quant Finance to provide the specific guidance I needed to pursue a career in this niche. Networking, external research, and leveraging alumni connections were essential for me in navigating the Quant job market.
Overall, while the MSFE program had its strengths in key finance and risk management courses, it would benefit from a more practical approach in its mathematics curriculum and stronger career support. Despite the challenges, I believe the personalized attention from professors and the focused learning environment are valuable assets that future students can leverage.
- Recommend
- Yes, I would recommend this program
- Students Quality
-
4.00 star(s)
- Courses/Instructors
-
3.00 star(s)
- Career Services
-
2.00 star(s)