- Headline
- High Academic Standards, Uneven Execution: Reviewing the Joint ETH–UZH Master’s Program
- Class of
- 2025
Reviewed by Verified Member
This Master’s program is jointly offered by the University of Zurich (UZH) and ETH Zürich. The curriculum includes courses from both universities, with the technical and mathematical subjects mainly taught at ETH, and most finance-oriented courses offered by UZH. Since students can choose from a range of electives, the proportion of time spent at each university varies individually. However, it is not possible to complete the degree without taking at least some courses at both institutions.
ETH Zürich
The quality of lectures at ETH is truly outstanding. Every lecturer I had was highly knowledgeable in their field, and many conveyed genuine enthusiasm for the subject matter, which made the classes engaging and inspiring. I was particularly impressed by how many lecturers cared deeply about teaching quality — something that, in my experience, is not always common at European universities. Having completed a STEM Bachelor’s degree at another major European institution, I can confidently say that ETH sets a remarkably high standard for both academic rigor and teaching commitment.
In terms of difficulty, ETH exams ranged roughly between 5 and 9 on a scale of 1 to 10, with some courses I did not take likely reaching a 10. Exams were generally fair and well-graded, reflecting both the course content and the students’ understanding.
University of Zurich (UZH)
The quality of lectures at UZH varied significantly. Some lecturers seemed disengaged and uninterested in teaching, while others were motivated but lacked the ability to deliver clear or structured lectures. Although there were a few excellent courses, I also encountered some of the worst lectures of my academic career at UZH.
Exams at UZH were generally easier than at ETH, ranging from about 2 to 6 in difficulty, though there were some exceptions. Unfortunately, grading was often inconsistent or poorly designed. Many assessments relied on arbitrary grading schemes that seemed intended to simplify marking for teaching assistants rather than to accurately measure student understanding. The few difficult exams were often not challenging because of the content, but because lecturers deliberately made them excessively long or included obscure details only mentioned in passing during class — practices that seemed more punitive than pedagogical.
Overall, I was not satisfied with the UZH component of the program. While I did learn a great deal from the better courses, the weaker ones fell short of the standards expected from a program that markets itself as prestigious. The degree coordinators and academic staff were consistently kind, responsive, and supportive. In contrast, interactions with the broader university administration were often cumbersome and discouraging. The level of bureaucracy was high, and staff outside the program office were generally not accommodating and occasionally impolite when it came to handling uncommon situations such as credit transfers or other non-standard requests.
Career Prospects
The program administration makes commendable efforts to build connections with industry partners and facilitate internships, master’s theses, and networking opportunities. Compared to typical degree programs at ETH, UZH, or other large non-UK universities, this is a definite strength. However, when compared to other specialized programs in quantitative finance, the career support feels somewhat limited. Securing a position outside of Switzerland requires additional effort, as the program’s industry reach is mostly local.
Overall Impression
Overall, I would recommend this degree. It offers excellent learning opportunities and some truly outstanding lectures, particularly at ETH. However, students should choose their courses carefully — ideally consulting those in the year above for advice. Tuition fees are relatively low, although living in Zurich can be expensive. Career opportunities in Switzerland after graduation are good, but internationally they are somewhat limited.
- Recommend
- Yes, I would recommend this program
- Students Quality
-
5.00 star(s)
- Courses/Instructors
-
4.00 star(s)
- Career Services
-
4.00 star(s)