- Joined
- 4/10/13
- Messages
- 24
- Points
- 23
I have offers for a data science and analytics role on the trading desk of a BB in New York and another for quantitative risk management within a $250B asset management firm and need your opinions. To provide more context:
a) The analytics role resides directly in the trading business and I would be reporting to a senior trader (my hiring manager). I was interviewed by three very senior traders (including global head of the desk's electronic trading business), MD of algo trading technology, a head quant and an analytics specialist. The work would entail exploring new signals for trade along with lots of data engineering. However, I was made clear that though I would be working very closely with the quants and technology, I would not be taking over the role of quants who reside outside S&T as a separate unit.
b) The second offer is a quant risk role which involves prototyping in Matlab to manage market, credit and liquidity risk. The team consists mostly of PhDs and I am apprehensive that in the long run I might be at a disadvantage (kindly correct me if I am wrong here).
I want to look beyond traditional risk roles in the industry and hence I'm pretty excited about the first role. It would be great if quantnet members could offer their opinions on this.
a) The analytics role resides directly in the trading business and I would be reporting to a senior trader (my hiring manager). I was interviewed by three very senior traders (including global head of the desk's electronic trading business), MD of algo trading technology, a head quant and an analytics specialist. The work would entail exploring new signals for trade along with lots of data engineering. However, I was made clear that though I would be working very closely with the quants and technology, I would not be taking over the role of quants who reside outside S&T as a separate unit.
b) The second offer is a quant risk role which involves prototyping in Matlab to manage market, credit and liquidity risk. The team consists mostly of PhDs and I am apprehensive that in the long run I might be at a disadvantage (kindly correct me if I am wrong here).
I want to look beyond traditional risk roles in the industry and hence I'm pretty excited about the first role. It would be great if quantnet members could offer their opinions on this.