- Joined
- 1/30/14
- Messages
- 81
- Points
- 18
Now that I've finally gotten into Columbia, I need to start deciding where I'm going to go. The issue is with these two schools, ranked number 1 & 2, respectively, is which is going to be better in the long run.
My background is a small name undergrad in NYC and 3 yrs work exp not in valuations and fundamental finance. I'm hoping to break into either a hedge fund or asset management role as a quant analyst.
Wondering if people can share thoughts and knowledge regarding each ones pros/cons in reference to the following points or any others you can think of:
Those are the big ones for me, but feel free to add your own points and thoughts.
Hope people from the other CMU/Columbia threads don't mind if I tag you: @Jedison @natalia.ochoa.a @Claudia P
My background is a small name undergrad in NYC and 3 yrs work exp not in valuations and fundamental finance. I'm hoping to break into either a hedge fund or asset management role as a quant analyst.
Wondering if people can share thoughts and knowledge regarding each ones pros/cons in reference to the following points or any others you can think of:
- Classes/Curriculum
- Is the push in computers at CMU much better or is the semi-open curriculum at Columbia better for people who don't necessarily want to be high freq-traders
- Recruiting and campus networking
- this is probably the most important for me, b/c I feel that like an MBA, I'm shelling out a ton of money for connections/alumni/school name)
- Brand recognition
- while I know that CMU is huge in the quant space here and it is a well-known school, how far does it reach in the fin eng industry and how well does the namebrand go in the finance world. For Columbia, everyone knows it/ivy league so will that push a little further into finance.
Those are the big ones for me, but feel free to add your own points and thoughts.
Hope people from the other CMU/Columbia threads don't mind if I tag you: @Jedison @natalia.ochoa.a @Claudia P