• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Determining if FGLS is a better estimator than OLS

Hob

Joined
10/14/13
Messages
14
Points
13
Hi all,

I am writing some c++ code to automatically do OLS regression, however, it appears using the Breusch-Pagan and White test that the data is heteroskedastic. Based on this I then weighted the residuals via FGLS outlined in Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Jeffrey Wooldridge)

The question I have is, once you have obtained a revised regression using FGLS, how do you establish that the errors are homoscedastic and that the FGLS is a better fit? (I believe \(R^{2}\) is not valid under GLS?)

Many thanks,

Hob
 
Last edited:
There should be a test for heteroskedasticity? And the sum squared errors should still be valid.
 
Back
Top