Financial Mathematics vs MFE: Distinguishing between the two?

Financial maths is the most rigorous of the two (and ultimately the most suitable route towards becoming a real quant). From personal experience a large chunk of MFE grads are - at best - mathematically pedestrian. A few weeks ago, I had the pleasure of interviewing a Berkeley MFE grad who couldn't give me the definition of an expectation...
 
Financial maths is the most rigorous of the two (and ultimately the most suitable route towards becoming a real quant). From personal experience a large chunk of MFE grads are - at best - mathematically pedestrian. A few weeks ago, I had the pleasure of interviewing a Berkeley MFE grad who couldn't give me the definition of an expectation...

So are people holding master's degrees in financial mathematics, as a general rule. There isn't enough time to do things rigorously and completely. So corners get cut.
 
Financial maths is the most rigorous of the two (and ultimately the most suitable route towards becoming a real quant). From personal experience a large chunk of MFE grads are - at best - mathematically pedestrian. A few weeks ago, I had the pleasure of interviewing a Berkeley MFE grad who couldn't give me the definition of an expectation...
Does this mean he/she is a shallow learner? That is, completed his program primarily by regurgitating algorithms?
 
Financial maths is the most rigorous of the two (and ultimately the most suitable route towards becoming a real quant). From personal experience a large chunk of MFE grads are - at best - mathematically pedestrian. A few weeks ago, I had the pleasure of interviewing a Berkeley MFE grad who couldn't give me the definition of an expectation...

This is all hogwash. From my experience is the reverse, so you don't really know.
 
Back
Top Bottom