Major makeover of Wall Street regs passes House

Joined
5/2/06
Messages
12,166
Points
273
WASHINGTON – The House passed the most ambitious restructuring of federal financial regulations since the New Deal on Friday, aiming to head off any replay of last year's Wall Street failures that plunged the nation deep into recession.

The sprawling legislation would give the government new powers to break up companies that threaten the economy, create a new agency to oversee consumer banking transactions and shine a light into shadow financial markets that have escaped the oversight of regulators.

The legislation would govern the simplest payday loan and the most complicated high-finance trades. In its breadth, the measure seeks to impose restrictions on every house of finance, from two-teller neighborhood thrifts to huge interconnected conglomerates.

The legislation aims to prevent manipulation and bring transparency to the $600 trillion global derivatives market. But an amendment by New York Democrat Scott Murphy, adopted 304-124 Thursday night, created an exception for nonfinancial companies that use derivatives as a hedge against market fluctuations rather than as a speculative investment. The amendment exempted businesses considered too small to be a risk to the financial system.

A Democratic effort to make more companies subject to derivatives regulations and to end abusive-trading rules failed.

Major makeover of Wall Street regs passes House - Yahoo! News
___
On the Net:
Read the bill, H.R.4173, at THOMAS (Library of Congress)
 
Large firms with assets of more than $50 billion, and hedge funds with at least $10 billion in assets, would pay into a $150 billion resolution fund that would cover the costs of dismantling such a company.

Wow.

I understand the ginormous firms to pay, but the hedge funds? I honestly see no rationale to this. Furthermore, what'll keep all the hedge funds from then simply relocating to offshore locations?
 
Large firms with assets of more than $50 billion, and hedge funds with at least $10 billion in assets, would pay into a $150 billion resolution fund that would cover the costs of dismantling such a company.

Wow.

I understand the ginormous firms to pay, but the hedge funds? I honestly see no rationale to this. Furthermore, what'll keep all the hedge funds from then simply relocating to offshore locations?
They dont need to shift to other locations, likely handle this by structuring into a management company advising multiple hedge funds under that threshold
 
Back
Top Bottom