- Joined
- 11/14/13
- Messages
- 1
- Points
- 11
Hi all, I'm wondering if I need to go back to get a shot at getting into the field, and if so what would be better, a PhD in EE or MFE.
Undergrad: No name school, EE(Maj)/Math(Min), 3.8
Grad: Univ of Washington, EE(DSP/Coms/Image Proc), 3.7
GRE (took just before change to new scoring): ~760Q, ~660V, ~4W
I've been out of school for 5 years or so, and worked as a software tester on embedded systems for 2 yrs, then spent 3 yrs as a hardware guy, so my software/prob/stats skills are a bit rusty. I used MATLAB, C++, Java, and did prob/stats/stocastics, a during during my masters and C as a software tester, and I've been brushing up on my programming skills lately.
I think getting back in to a PhD program would probably be easier than getting into a MFE, but the prospect of spending 5+ years with low income doesn't sound appealing at all.
From reviewing books like Cracking the Coding Interview, I think I could answer questions at that level of technical detail for C++ or Java, but questions deeper than that would cause me trouble.
Do I even need to go back? Should I just spend the time beefing up on my prob/stats/stocastics and programming? Are certificate programs worthwhile? I tend to interview poorly, that's one of the reasons I think getting a credential might be helpful.
Thanks.
Undergrad: No name school, EE(Maj)/Math(Min), 3.8
Grad: Univ of Washington, EE(DSP/Coms/Image Proc), 3.7
GRE (took just before change to new scoring): ~760Q, ~660V, ~4W
I've been out of school for 5 years or so, and worked as a software tester on embedded systems for 2 yrs, then spent 3 yrs as a hardware guy, so my software/prob/stats skills are a bit rusty. I used MATLAB, C++, Java, and did prob/stats/stocastics, a during during my masters and C as a software tester, and I've been brushing up on my programming skills lately.
I think getting back in to a PhD program would probably be easier than getting into a MFE, but the prospect of spending 5+ years with low income doesn't sound appealing at all.
From reviewing books like Cracking the Coding Interview, I think I could answer questions at that level of technical detail for C++ or Java, but questions deeper than that would cause me trouble.
Do I even need to go back? Should I just spend the time beefing up on my prob/stats/stocastics and programming? Are certificate programs worthwhile? I tend to interview poorly, that's one of the reasons I think getting a credential might be helpful.
Thanks.