Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Online Courses
2022 Rankings
2022 MFE Programs Rankings Methodology
Reviews
Latest reviews
Search resources
Tracker
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering.
Learn more
Join!
Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job.
Learn more
Join!
An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models.
Learn more
Join!
Home
Forums
Quant Education
Education Advice
PhD Dilemma: Which program to choose?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mathromancer" data-source="post: 286438" data-attributes="member: 44922"><p>If your goal is to get back into the quant space, you may know better than me, but my personal opinion is that it doesn't matter which of these schools you go to given that you already have experience working at a top fund. The difference in outcome that you would get from choosing one school over the other is very likely to be only worth an epsilon in that regard.</p><p></p><p>The only thing I could really see making a difference is if</p><p>1. There is a particular shop you're going for and you won't take anything else, then maybe you should see the backgrounds of people who work there and go to a school that most of them went to.</p><p>2. One school will afford you a research topic or courses that is more ML focused than the others (given the way the industry seems to be going). Frankly, however, I don't think this is that important since you can learn this anywhere even if your research isn't related to ML per se.</p><p></p><p>Now, the answer does become different if instead you were dead set on academia. In that case you would need to do some due diligence and check the alumni of these programs and see where they end up. Does everyone from the Stanford program go to industry? Then don't go there if you want to be a professor.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, if academia will be your goal you need to consider what topic you would study at each place and whether or not these topics are "hot". I've seen plenty of just "good but not great" students get TT positions at good schools simply because they studied an area that was "in", and I've seen tons of Math geniuses get low tier or only post-doc offers because they studied some esoteric area that no one else cares about.</p><p></p><p>Personally, i'm partial to Princeton, CMU, Stanford, but then again my PhD is in Statistics <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />. Yale is a good department for sure, but tbh I think it's the weakest one of all the offers you've gotten. All of those schools have some really heavy hitters that you could work with (for example Jianqing Fan at Princeton).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mathromancer, post: 286438, member: 44922"] If your goal is to get back into the quant space, you may know better than me, but my personal opinion is that it doesn't matter which of these schools you go to given that you already have experience working at a top fund. The difference in outcome that you would get from choosing one school over the other is very likely to be only worth an epsilon in that regard. The only thing I could really see making a difference is if 1. There is a particular shop you're going for and you won't take anything else, then maybe you should see the backgrounds of people who work there and go to a school that most of them went to. 2. One school will afford you a research topic or courses that is more ML focused than the others (given the way the industry seems to be going). Frankly, however, I don't think this is that important since you can learn this anywhere even if your research isn't related to ML per se. Now, the answer does become different if instead you were dead set on academia. In that case you would need to do some due diligence and check the alumni of these programs and see where they end up. Does everyone from the Stanford program go to industry? Then don't go there if you want to be a professor. Similarly, if academia will be your goal you need to consider what topic you would study at each place and whether or not these topics are "hot". I've seen plenty of just "good but not great" students get TT positions at good schools simply because they studied an area that was "in", and I've seen tons of Math geniuses get low tier or only post-doc offers because they studied some esoteric area that no one else cares about. Personally, i'm partial to Princeton, CMU, Stanford, but then again my PhD is in Statistics :). Yale is a good department for sure, but tbh I think it's the weakest one of all the offers you've gotten. All of those schools have some really heavy hitters that you could work with (for example Jianqing Fan at Princeton). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Quant Education
Education Advice
PhD Dilemma: Which program to choose?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top