Semester Applicants Admitted Rate Enrolled Yield
Fall 2002 240 77 32% 60 78%
Fall 2003 390 92 24% 59 64%
Fall 2004 251 73 29% 60 82%
Fall 2005 208 81 39% 60 74%
Fall 2006 243 91 37% 59 65%
Fall 2007 367 83 23% 65 78%
Nope. The video requirement was added only a few months ago and applied to the 2008, 2009 applicants.I'm thinking the 3-5 minute video essay weeds out a lot of prospective applicants...
Please note that the 9% acceptance is for the FT program only. They have PT, non-degree, etc programs and if included, the number is no where near 9%I graduated about a year ago from NYU's math-finance masters program, but I began it way back in 2001 as a part-time student. I think the acceptance rate back when I entered was towards the high end of the 20% - 40% range (else how would I have gotten in ;-) , but as such programs have increased in popularity, the application rate has soared and the acceptance rate has dropped. Here is what they said in an email to alumni a couple of weeks ago:
"Applications to the full-time program have been growing by leaps and bounds from about 350 in 2005 to 500 in 2006, to over 750 this year. So while our class size has grown slightly, from 27 in 2005 to 33 in 2006, applications have grown even more rapidly. In other words, we have been able to maintain the same high level of quality students as in past classes. Admissions are very competitive. This year we accepted only about 9% of our applicants for full-time study."
I saw an article on the UC Berkeley MFE website from the March/April 2006 Financial Engineering News (http://mfe.haas.berkeley.edu/download/fe_news_report_2006.pdf) which said "The program now has an annual intake of 60 students from applications that number anywhere from 200 to 400 each year." That's a bit ambiguous as to whether sixty is the class size or the number of students accepted; if it's the class size it sounds like the acceptance rate would overlap or exceed the 20%-40% range. That article also claimed a "100%" placement record for graduates. NYU used to make a similar claim, but in the same alumni email I quoted above they said: "This year placement is proving to be more of a challenge than usual. Obviously, adverse market conditions are a major factor. So far, 15 of 32 students looking for full time positions have received full time offers and 8 have accepted them. Students continue to get interviews for good quantitative positions at top firms, but the pace of offers lags behind previous years. Past experience has shown that we can expect many offers to come in the November to January time frame, but it would be dangerous to wait longer before acting."
By the way, the UCB acceptance number was taken from their website last year. They now removed it. Who knows why.I can't comment personally on NYU, but I recently finished the MFE at Berkeley.
Regarding admittance statistics, I believe my class was in the 20-40% range as spoken about. Despite this, the caliber of students was extremely high (~40% already with PhDs, ~75% with perfect GRE quant scores). None of us were really sure how/why the admit rate was so high while still attracting top notch candidates.
700 people applied to all of their programs (FT/PT/non-degree) (Edit: numbers refer to FT program only)I think 9% is a good number for NYU considering that 700 people apply.
From a Columbia student
Over 650 students applied to be a part of the class of '08. Roughly 80 students were offered admission
That's a 12.3% acceptance rate. It's a bit unreliable since the 2008 MSFE size is 67 students so the number of admits must be higher
Use some sense dear... Some international students might not be FT students.Those tables are a lot of fun to look at. I know the people who constitute the 2% in our class...
Curious: 28 FT students and 27 international students. I can think of more than a few full-time, not international students. Is an "international student" someone here on a student visa, or is there some other definition?