• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Business major transition to quant?

bigbadwolf said:
Because, er, they've always been fascinated by the sexy but arcane world of quant finance (while knowing bugger all about the details) and the siren song of big money is irresistible. For some inexplicable reason they never took calc in high school and took psychology or political science in college and now, could someone please tell them how to complete the math requirements of the MFE cheap rapidly, cheaply, and effortlessly? These posts are all frivolous and there are too many of them on this forum, and submitted by people who have no intention of going through the hard and sustained slog of building a real math background. In short, they're trolls, asking pointless and frivolous questions which have already been answered umpteen times on this forum or can be found with a Google search.
Click to expand...

The predicament I am in now is that I am actually taking all those 'real math background' (real/complex analysis, probability (calculus based), stochastic process, time series, linear algebra, vector calculus, metric spaces, measure next semester) and financial maths, but not completely sure whether it is for me... I feel like I have definitely jumped on the bandwagon as you described, but I do kind of have the background (and somewhat good grades) to back it up with lol...
 
Gavin L said:
The predicament I am in now is that I am actually taking all those 'real math background' (real/complex analysis, probability (calculus based), stochastic process, time series, linear algebra, vector calculus, metric spaces, measure next semester) and financial maths, but not completely sure whether it is for me... I feel like I have definitely jumped on the bandwagon as you described, but I do kind of have the background (and somewhat good grades) to back it up with lol...
Click to expand...

If you're doing all these courses simultaneously, it's too much too fast and you won't be able to digest it all, or see the connections between them. "Less is more" and "less haste, more speed."
 
bigbadwolf said:
If you're doing all these courses simultaneously, it's too much too fast and you won't be able to digest it all, or see the connections between them. "Less is more" and "less haste, more speed."
Click to expand...
Nah that's just a historical list haha. I'm doing Stochastic Processes, Metric Spaces, (Linear models and computational science - Matlab on ODEs/PDEs) this semester.
 
Yes, I would do a PhD in finance if I were you. You said you would consider being a professor, and this is the way to do it.

You can take many of the same courses MFE's take. I know that at GT they are encouraging a little bit of crossover of the MBA, grad finance, and QCF programs, for example. I imagine it is the same at many places.

I really see no upside to doing an MFE for you. You already have a decent job. If you prefer an intellectual challenge, being a research professor is probably better. Most MFE's are people who gravitate towards STEM and need to find something to do with their talents/skills.
 
bigbadwolf said:
Because, er, they've always been fascinated by the sexy but arcane world of quant finance (while knowing bugger all about the details) and the siren song of big money is irresistible. For some inexplicable reason they never took calc in high school and took psychology or political science in college and now, could someone please tell them how to complete the math requirements of the MFE cheap rapidly, cheaply, and effortlessly? These posts are all frivolous and there are too many of them on this forum, and submitted by people who have no intention of going through the hard and sustained slog of building a real math background. In short, they're trolls, asking pointless and frivolous questions which have already been answered umpteen times on this forum or can be found with a Google search.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say there's a need to get nasty... o_O
 
help!

i have a similar background as op, a business administration major. now im in my 4th year and fascinated by quant finance (alchemy of wall street!).

i took biz calc1 and biz stats, and am confident in my ability to study higher math (i always like math!).

i would love to study mfe, the secrete sauce of finance alchemist, using sophisticated math models to rule the world and becoming flashy boys utilizing high frequency algorithm to exploit the market! so eccentric!

please assess my chances at shooting top mfe schools and help me pick math electives for my final quarter at school! thx!
 
IntoDarkness said:
help!

i have a similar background as op, a business administration major. now im in my 4th year and fascinated by quant finance (alchemy of wall street!).

i took biz calc1 and biz stats, and am confident in my ability to study higher math (i always like math!).

i would love to study mfe, the secrete sauce of finance alchemist, using sophisticated math models to rule the world and becoming flashy boys utilizing high frequency algorithm to exploit the market! so eccentric!

please assess my chances at shooting top mfe schools and help me pick math electives for my final quarter at school! thx!
Click to expand...

can't tell if srs or troll...
 
Just as there's "business calc" (hang on a sec, let me throw up in disgust), there should also be "business stochastic processes." And there's a definite niche for books like "Stochastic Processes for Dummies/Idiots."
 
bigbadwolf said:
Just as there's "business calc" (hang on a sec, let me throw up in disgust), there should also be "business stochastic processes." And there's a definite niche for books like "Stochastic Processes for Dummies/Idiots."
Click to expand...

My experience at Columbia over the past year has led me to believe that many of the people in the business school who you'd probably term to be "dummies/idiots" will probably be making significantly more money over the courses of their careers than many of the math geeks in my program with no social skills who think they're about to become masters of the universe for knowing what Ito's Lemma is... I'd be careful who you're condescending to.
 
CasanovaJ said:
My experience at Columbia over the past year has led me to believe that many of the people in the business school who you'd probably term to be "dummies/idiots" will probably be making significantly more money over the courses of their careers than many of the math geeks in my program with no social skills who think they're about to become masters of the universe for knowing what Ito's Lemma is... I'd be careful who you're condescending to.
Click to expand...

Ah, silly me: the sole criterion is of course the dollar. That alone measures how much of a man one is, one's virility, one's power.
 
CasanovaJ said:
My experience at Columbia over the past year has led me to believe that many of the people in the business school who you'd probably term to be "dummies/idiots" will probably be making significantly more money over the courses of their careers than many of the math geeks in my program with no social skills who think they're about to become masters of the universe for knowing what Ito's Lemma is... I'd be careful who you're condescending to.
Click to expand...
'Might' be the case in finance but I don't think in the world of mathematics money buys respect.
Also doesn't "Masters of the universe" refer more to the MFINs of a precedent era than the MFEs?
Fact is, the industry is getting more technical, I hope MFEs become the MFINs of tomorrow.
Yes right now in this industry money gets you respect you may not deserve, but one can only hope with the inclusion of more people with more substance (math) over form (business and all) It will change.

You ought to take a look at the pdf I posted earlier, and read some of the responses a student thinking about majoring in finance got when he asked if he needed to be good at math.

If some only get into Quantitative Finance for the money, then they will respect those making more money than them just for that fact alone. But if they care about finance, or mathematical finance as a science, at least as much as they did when they chose to pursue a science degree, then I can't imagine any of them having respect for people who are basically "empty-suits" as Taleb calls them.
 
TehRaio said:
'Might' be the case in finance but I don't think in the world of mathematics money buys respect.
Also doesn't "Masters of the universe" refer more to the MFINs of a precedent era than the MFEs?
Fact is, the industry is getting more technical, I hope MFEs become the MFINs of tomorrow.
Yes right now in this industry money gets you respect you may not deserve, but one can only hope with the inclusion of more people with more substance (math) over form (business and all) It will change.

You ought to take a look at the pdf I posted earlier, and read some of the responses a student thinking about majoring in finance got when he asked if he needed to be good at math.

If some only get into Quantitative Finance for the money, then they will respect those making more money than them just for that fact alone. But if they care about finance, or mathematical finance as a science, at least as much as they did when they chose to pursue a science degree, then I can't imagine any of them having respect for people who are basically "empty-suits" as Taleb calls them.
Click to expand...
Math skills and business skills are not mutually exclusive, they're both important, anyone who only has one of them is not in a position to inpugn someone who only has the other, and anyone serious about their career should want both.
 
Last edited:
CasanovaJ said:
Math skills and business skills are not mutually exclusive, they're both important, anyone who only has one of them is not in a position to impugn someone who only has the other, and anyone serious about their careers should aspire to have both.
Click to expand...

I sort of agree. I can't help but feel that they should never be put on the same pedestal, and I might not be the only one thinking that on this forum. If this industry is going to change for the better, It needs to do away with the general managers for the technical ones. People who, as you rightfully said, are good at doing business with a strong understanding of the science behind their work.
 
CasanovaJ said:
Math skills and business skills are not mutually exclusive, they're both important, anyone who only has one of them is not in a position to inpugn someone who only has the other, and anyone serious about their career should want both.
Click to expand...

No, that's not the point. The point is that business calc serves no purpose -- it has nothing to do with business skills. It's just another useless filler course. Differentiation and integration of polynomial functions and then some "applications" to things like marginal revenue and marginal cost -- the kind of "application" that never arises in real life. Those taking this course are not prepared to take further calc nor have they developed any real business skill by so doing. If you're doing math, either do it properly or not at all. If not at all, fine -- there's only a limited need for quants and applied mathematicians. And to return to the title of the thread, that's the reason why a business major will (probably) not be able to make the transition to quant.
 
Back
Top