Hi guys,
I'm an Economics graduate with a decent knowledge of R and some very basic Java knowledge after taking one class. I feel that I need to surrender to the fact that I probably won't ever become a great quant of the calibre of those with computer science/software engineering/mathematics background. Just reading the first few pages of "Teach yourself C++ in.." makes my head go in circles. I think I might have to realize that my strengths lie elsewhere.
Okay... So why the heck did I apply to the Columbia Master in Financial Engineering program?? Well, I really want to work in the USA and I saw the program as a nice stepping stone. Plus, the classes looked absolutely doable: I've already taken two Econometrics courses, Linear Algebra and Probability & Statistics with STEM students, graduate level courses on Quantitative Finance (Ito calculus, binomial models, Black Scholes, Greeks etc..) and Time Series Analysis (ARMA, ARCH, GARCH etc). Soooo I guess I'm not TOTALLY screwed! And I like math, I like derivatives, I even like R.. But I just know that I'm at a huge disadvantage against stronger programmers. I think I'll never be the guy who can write codes all day, I just don't have what it takes, even if I might become an OKAY programmer.
This brings me to my question, as I already got an interview at Columbia. IF I get accepted, should I accept it? More to the point, even though I could get through the program without much programming, would anyone hire me?? What kind of a job could I get? Wouldn't everyone just laugh me off compared to much better "quant" candidates? Finally, should I suck it up, put down "The Intelligent Investor" and use all my free time to self-learn C++ (am I screwed without it)? (I'm aware of the QN/Baruch class, would maybe try that)
TLDR: I'm good at plenty of things but not programming. Would I be an a-hole by joining an MFE program?
Thanks a lot!
I'm an Economics graduate with a decent knowledge of R and some very basic Java knowledge after taking one class. I feel that I need to surrender to the fact that I probably won't ever become a great quant of the calibre of those with computer science/software engineering/mathematics background. Just reading the first few pages of "Teach yourself C++ in.." makes my head go in circles. I think I might have to realize that my strengths lie elsewhere.
Okay... So why the heck did I apply to the Columbia Master in Financial Engineering program?? Well, I really want to work in the USA and I saw the program as a nice stepping stone. Plus, the classes looked absolutely doable: I've already taken two Econometrics courses, Linear Algebra and Probability & Statistics with STEM students, graduate level courses on Quantitative Finance (Ito calculus, binomial models, Black Scholes, Greeks etc..) and Time Series Analysis (ARMA, ARCH, GARCH etc). Soooo I guess I'm not TOTALLY screwed! And I like math, I like derivatives, I even like R.. But I just know that I'm at a huge disadvantage against stronger programmers. I think I'll never be the guy who can write codes all day, I just don't have what it takes, even if I might become an OKAY programmer.
This brings me to my question, as I already got an interview at Columbia. IF I get accepted, should I accept it? More to the point, even though I could get through the program without much programming, would anyone hire me?? What kind of a job could I get? Wouldn't everyone just laugh me off compared to much better "quant" candidates? Finally, should I suck it up, put down "The Intelligent Investor" and use all my free time to self-learn C++ (am I screwed without it)? (I'm aware of the QN/Baruch class, would maybe try that)
TLDR: I'm good at plenty of things but not programming. Would I be an a-hole by joining an MFE program?
Thanks a lot!