Hello, can someone illustrate the differences in the fields of financial engineering, financial risk management and actuarial science? I am particularly confused on the distinction between risk management and actuarial science (both have their separate certification also, namely FRM and professional actuarial exams).
They seemed to be related, yet different. Each of the field also has their own Master degree.
My impression is that MFE is the most quantitative in nature and equips students with the abilities to do modeling of financial markets, risk and pricing of products and understand the assumptions underlying the models. While risk management and actuarial people focus on how to manage risk using the tools developed by financial engineers. And some financial engineers also go into risk management areas to work.
Is my understanding correct? If so, does it mean MFE gives a graduate more career options in modeling, risk management or actuarial science, compared to the other degrees which prepare students exclusively for the risk management areas?
Hope friends on this forum can help to clear my confusion. Thank you!
They seemed to be related, yet different. Each of the field also has their own Master degree.
My impression is that MFE is the most quantitative in nature and equips students with the abilities to do modeling of financial markets, risk and pricing of products and understand the assumptions underlying the models. While risk management and actuarial people focus on how to manage risk using the tools developed by financial engineers. And some financial engineers also go into risk management areas to work.
Is my understanding correct? If so, does it mean MFE gives a graduate more career options in modeling, risk management or actuarial science, compared to the other degrees which prepare students exclusively for the risk management areas?
Hope friends on this forum can help to clear my confusion. Thank you!