• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

HARVARD FAILS HEDGE FUNDS 101, LOSES $250M

Joined
5/2/06
Messages
11,750
Points
273
HARVARD FAILS HEDGE FUNDS 101, LOSES $250M
By RODDY BOYD


August 1, 2007 -- Highly levered bets, poor hedges and a panicky bond market conspired to teach the managers of Harvard University's massive endowment fund a hard lesson about investing in hedge funds that they won't soon forget.

The sudden collapse of Sowood Capital Management has whittled down the $500 million invested by the managers of Harvard University's endowment - called the Harvard Management Co. - by more than half.

According to a letter to investors issued late Monday, the formerly $3 billion fund is now worth under $1.5 billion after completing the sale of its bond portfolio to Citadel Investment Group. A Harvard spokesman declined to comment.

The loss of at least $250 million appears to be the single biggest investment debacle in the recent history of the $29.2 billion Harvard endowment. Founded in March 2004, Sowood's general partner was Jeffrey Larson, long one of Harvard Management's star portfolio managers, who earned $17.3 million in 2004 running the endowment's international equities portfolio.

Larson's track record in foreign stocks was so good - averaging returns of 11.6 percent -that Harvard Management backed the launch of Sowood in March 2004 with a stake of $500 million. The endowment also invested $200 million in a Sowood commodity fund.

Sowood's losses appear to be the result of a combination of excessive leverage in its portfolio of corporate bonds, credit default swaps and loans - sectors where prices have come under severe pressure.
 
ouch..

but...250MM/29.3BLN < 1%. Nonetheless this proves, once again, that you are only as good as your last trade...
 
Back
Top