Hi,
I'm a senior undergraduate (Computer Science and Engineering) at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India.
My attention has been drawn recently to a job as a quant, as it combines math, physics and computing, all of which are my interest areas (and I have a good track record in each).
But I'm doubtful about MFE being the ideal means to secure such a job. This has been the main precipitating factor.
The link essentially draws the following inferences --
Of course, it is just someone's personal opinion, but include frighteningly vociferous allegations against MFE -- enough to make me think thrice before applying. Having said that, does it make sense to continue with graduate studies in CS (masters), probably taking courses in applied math?
I'm a senior undergraduate (Computer Science and Engineering) at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India.
My attention has been drawn recently to a job as a quant, as it combines math, physics and computing, all of which are my interest areas (and I have a good track record in each).
But I'm doubtful about MFE being the ideal means to secure such a job. This has been the main precipitating factor.
The link essentially draws the following inferences --
- A 1 year program is not sufficient to learn the nuances of a job in quantitative finance
- What math we learn in an MFE program would rarely be used (no point knowing 3 ways to solve the BS equation)
- MBAs are more likely to get front desk jobs; managers would not trust quants with client interaction.
Of course, it is just someone's personal opinion, but include frighteningly vociferous allegations against MFE -- enough to make me think thrice before applying. Having said that, does it make sense to continue with graduate studies in CS (masters), probably taking courses in applied math?