Michael Lewis: When Irish Eyes Are Crying

Joined
5/2/06
Messages
12,334
Points
273
First Iceland. Then Greece. Now Ireland, which headed for bankruptcy with its own mysterious logic. In 2000, suddenly among the richest people in Europe, the Irish decided to buy their country—from one another. After which their banks and government really screwed them. So where’s the rage?

Ireland’s financial disaster shared some things with Iceland’s. It was created by the sort of men who ignore their wives’ suggestions that maybe they should stop and ask for directions, for instance. But while Icelandic males used foreign money to conquer foreign places—trophy companies in Britain, chunks of Scandinavia—the Irish male used foreign money to conquer Ireland. Left alone in a dark room with a pile of money, the Irish decided what they really wanted to do with it was to buy Ireland. From one another. An Irish economist named Morgan Kelly, whose estimates of Irish bank losses have been the most prescient, made a back-of-the-envelope calculation that puts the losses of all Irish banks at roughly 106 billion euros. (Think $10 trillion.) At the rate money currently flows into the Irish treasury, Irish bank losses alone would absorb every penny of Irish taxes for at least the next three years.

In recognition of the spectacular losses, the entire Irish economy has almost dutifully collapsed. When you fly into Dublin you are traveling, for the first time in 15 years, against the traffic. The Irish are once again leaving Ireland, along with hordes of migrant workers. In late 2006, the unemployment rate stood at a bit more than 4 percent; now it’s 14 percent and climbing toward rates not experienced since the mid-1980s. Just a few years ago, Ireland was able to borrow money more cheaply than Germany; now, if it can borrow at all, it will be charged interest rates nearly 6 percent higher than Germany, another echo of a distant past. The Irish budget deficit—which three years ago was a surplus—is now 32 percent of its G.D.P., the highest by far in the history of the Eurozone. One credit-analysis firm has judged Ireland the third-most-likely country to default. Not quite as risky for the global investor as Venezuela, but riskier than Iraq. Distinctly Third World, in any case.

Read More When Irish Eyes Are Crying | Business | Vanity Fair
 
Ireland isn't unique in that its young are leaving: exactly the same phenomenon is occuring in Latvia as well.

It's difficult for me to understand the financial system as a whole: it seems to be all smoke and mirrors. The losses on real estate worth are paper losses, fictitious wealth. Yet it seems that bailouts and "stimulus packages" are designed to keep aloft unsustainable Ponzi schemes of fictitious wealth at a very real cost of further impoverishing the working-class poor. And this seems to be a global phenomenon: in the US, it is states and municipalities using the pretext of deficits to slash spending and employment; in the Middle East it is speculation-fueled commodity inflation that has provoked uprisings and riots as the poor simply cannot afford to eat.
 
"The Harvard demographers admitted their theory explained only part of what had happened. At the bottom of the success of the Irish there remains, even now, some mystery"

Strange; they should know.

Here is a very short history of what happened from someone who observed developments from a close distance. From 1993 to 1999 the real economy grew because of the large number of companies that came to Ireland. The workforce was well educated in maths, CS, physics etc. Once when I was on vacation in 1998 1000 jobs were created in 1 week. In this period a house that would cost 20K in 1990 now cost 110K in 2000, That's when the extra money came on the scene and people became property developers, as in other countries. You probably know that property was the new wealth. Except they did it bigger as witnessed by the growth of Anglo Irish. Almost no one saw it coming and those who did (myself included) where ignored.

And that's the way it is. It's crystal clear for me.

BTW referring to Mr. Lewis' article: there was no famine in Ireland. But there was a potato crop failure. At the time Ireland exported tons of grain, beef etc. per day to Britian and Europe.
The article is a bit hotch-potch. A great read is David McWilliams books and works who forecasted this all along.

 
BTW referring to Mr. Lewis' article: there was no famine in Ireland. But there was a potato crop failure. At the time Ireland exported tons of grain, beef etc. per day to Britian and Europe.

If a third of the population was dependent on the potato, wouldn't a crop failure precipitate famine? And if it didn't, why the mass exodus at the time?
 
If a third of the population was dependent on the potato, wouldn't a crop failure precipitate famine? And if it didn't, why the mass exodus at the time?
The whole population was dependent on the potato AFAIK; grain was to pay the rent. At a later stage they formed the soup kitchens.In exchange the starving built those idyllic (and useless) stone walls up the sides of mountains.

Anyways, here is good read about David McWilliams. He is really very good

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_McWilliams

BTW Exports from Ireland grew by 10% in 2010.
 
Back
Top Bottom