I've been facing this dilemma for the past week, and so I've decided to hear what fellow QuantNet members have to say. This is a pretty common topic, so instead of regurgitating known facts about each program, I'll just give a bit of info about me, and hopefully those with some knowledge of each program can give me some advice as to what they think is a best fit.
Note: I'm not considering the NYC CMU campus – I don't find the idea of spending $50k+ for distance learning very good… Also, because of a scholarship, cost is almost identical for both schools
Some stuff about me:
• Just graduated from undergrad, Economics/O.R majors; Math/Finance minors
• No finance experience
• Have a fair amount of programming experience in C++/VBA
• Have a pretty balanced background of Math (Calc-based Prob & Stats, linear algebra) and finance (couple of classes in valuation and derivatives)
• Ideally I want to work in either quantitative portfolio/asset management or product structuring
• I'm fairly introverted
• I love city life, but I could live in Pitt for a few semesters
What I like/dislike about each program
•NYU
Like that its curriculum is well-structured, but you can still chose a few electives. Location is excellent, career placement has been good, weekly seminars and classes being taught by practitioners are good ways to network and get skin in the industry.
Don't like that compared to CMU, it looks like there is a smaller breadth of classes, it's only based in the Math Dept. and it can seem a tad bit too theoretical.They are not very clear about their placement statistics. Also heard some bad things about quality of teaching and availability of professors, as well as nonchalant T.A.'s
•CMU
Like that it has a wide curriculum with focus on applications, great placement, transparent about job statistics, nice campus, program is a cross of 4 schools yet classes are unique. Also seems more acclaimed than NYU, and has top-notch career services since it's in the B-School.
Don't like the location since it makes it seem like it'd be hard to network and might make it harder for me to get a job; the fact that professors are not current practitioners doesn't thrill me much either.
How important would you say location is for somebody like me? I've visited NYU already and will be visiting CMU next week, but in the meanwhile, I'd still love to hear everyone's thoughts Thanks guys!
Note: I'm not considering the NYC CMU campus – I don't find the idea of spending $50k+ for distance learning very good… Also, because of a scholarship, cost is almost identical for both schools
Some stuff about me:
• Just graduated from undergrad, Economics/O.R majors; Math/Finance minors
• No finance experience
• Have a fair amount of programming experience in C++/VBA
• Have a pretty balanced background of Math (Calc-based Prob & Stats, linear algebra) and finance (couple of classes in valuation and derivatives)
• Ideally I want to work in either quantitative portfolio/asset management or product structuring
• I'm fairly introverted
• I love city life, but I could live in Pitt for a few semesters
What I like/dislike about each program
•NYU
Like that its curriculum is well-structured, but you can still chose a few electives. Location is excellent, career placement has been good, weekly seminars and classes being taught by practitioners are good ways to network and get skin in the industry.
Don't like that compared to CMU, it looks like there is a smaller breadth of classes, it's only based in the Math Dept. and it can seem a tad bit too theoretical.They are not very clear about their placement statistics. Also heard some bad things about quality of teaching and availability of professors, as well as nonchalant T.A.'s
•CMU
Like that it has a wide curriculum with focus on applications, great placement, transparent about job statistics, nice campus, program is a cross of 4 schools yet classes are unique. Also seems more acclaimed than NYU, and has top-notch career services since it's in the B-School.
Don't like the location since it makes it seem like it'd be hard to network and might make it harder for me to get a job; the fact that professors are not current practitioners doesn't thrill me much either.
How important would you say location is for somebody like me? I've visited NYU already and will be visiting CMU next week, but in the meanwhile, I'd still love to hear everyone's thoughts Thanks guys!