Daniel Duffy
C++ author, trainer
- Joined
- 10/4/07
- Messages
- 10,431
- Points
- 648
Nowadays the primary lack is that of time, not of hardware resources or ready-to-use libraries.
It only seems that way. You gotta invest in the upkeep of software products. In general, adding new features to a product takes longer and longer. That is the issue IMO, not time as such. It's a management issue.
I have seen some legacy code, which had to fit in 640K RAM => elegance and well-thought optimization.
You lucky devil. What did you do with the left-0ver memory? Used it for games. We used to write COBOL applications in 4K.
Imagine being the architect of a team of ZX80 programmers? Hardware and tools change, but humans tend to remain constant.
It only seems that way. You gotta invest in the upkeep of software products. In general, adding new features to a product takes longer and longer. That is the issue IMO, not time as such. It's a management issue.
I have seen some legacy code, which had to fit in 640K RAM => elegance and well-thought optimization.
You lucky devil. What did you do with the left-0ver memory? Used it for games. We used to write COBOL applications in 4K.
Imagine being the architect of a team of ZX80 programmers? Hardware and tools change, but humans tend to remain constant.
Last edited: