Picking up from my original thread, let's get back to the Q/A session...
1) What would be the best way for an entry-level MFE grad to get an interview with hiring managers ? Applicants can apply to a job via the firm's website (going through HR), inquire with a contact in that firm, going to HH, etc...
Answer: the best way is to know someone personally that can "grease the wheels". Barring that, I have to assume that you have some career fairs where companies come on-campus to interview. Third, and this isn't easy, find a headhunter that is willing and able to represent you. Many companies do not pay recruiters to find them entry-level talent, so you may have trouble getting much exposure this way. Finally, and least helpful, apply to the company via their website. You need to understand, though, that the people that are screening resumes may or may not have the capacity to really understand what it is that you bring to the table and you may be overlooked unfairly. Whatever way you choose to get your introduction, make sure you know EXACTLY who has your resume. If you send your resume to a friend at a bank and he is unable to get anything accomplished for you, you may be hurting yourself if you happen to also work with a headhunter who has a relationship with that institution. If a bank/fund has your resume and a headhunter then tries to introduce you to his network of managers in the same area, odds are that you will NOT get an interview because they may feel you're gaming the system.
Someone already working on Wall Street would have more options than a fresh graduate. What would you advise MFE graduates looking to break in the industry ?
Answer: Read more and network. There are a number of places available to get yourself involved and to meet others in the industry. I'm a huge fan of Nuclear Phynance (
http://www.nuclearphynance.com/). It is a global forum built and maintained by quants, software engineers and quant traders. If you decide to check it out, read many of the threads before asking any questions or giving your opinion. Many of the folks in this site have little sense of humor for those who have little or no initiative.
2) What qualifications are you looking for from MFE graduates ? We have various levels of experience here but the common ones are
a) fresh graduates with quantitative background,
b) experienced IT professionals going to the finance space,
c) finance professionals trying to update their quant skills to move to front desks,
d) all others
Answer: You have no idea how tough of a question this is to answer. Right or wrong, there are a group of usual suspects that I - and every other headhunter and hiring manager - look for: numerate undergrad degree from a top university, at least a basic exposure to programming (depending on experience level) and something that differentiates you from the herd. You need to understand - I am not in the "job placement" industry. I don't get paid to find someone a "job". My clients pay me to find the best talent. Period. To be even more fair and honest, most people don't pass my bar to be presented to my clients. It's a tough fact, but I don't make the rules. There is a reason why Goldman Sachs, DE Shaw, Renaissance and others of this caliber have the reputations they have - they hire extremely selectively. I, however, don't discriminate. I read every resume and, when warranted, will converse with those candidates I believe have a solid chance of being hired by one of my clients. This question can take up quite a bit more space, so I'll end my answer here. If anyone would like further clarification, ask me.
I'd like to know what you look for specially in group a) and b) since that's majority of people who do MFE degrees these days.
Answer: See above.
3) Now there seems to be an abuse of and confusion about the term "quant". From a HH's perspective, what do you qualify as a "quant" ? Does one necessarily need a PhD to be called "quant" ?
I personally could care less about what I will be called but I have seen way to many questions about this that I'd like to have a better understanding of the use of it so I can be more informed.
Answer: From my perspective, a quant need not have a PhD - and I know many who don't. Ask me this question again as it relates to you. Are you talking about a quant who would reside on a desk? A "research" quant like those at Bloomberg or in academia? Or do you refer to thos who are developing quantitative trading strategies?
4) From your experience placing people on WS, what stories/lessons/mistakes from your recruits that you like to share with us. What are the most common mistakes, tricks ? This questions focus on the quant space only.
Answer: Do you ever ask any easy questions?!!! There are many stories, lessons and mistakes that could take up all of my bandwidth for today, but I'll address what you and others probably feel is the most important. What are the "tricks"? The answer is easy: there are none. I will quote you what a friend of mine told me long ago (he's now a partner in a global quant strategies team): there is no way to prepare for an interview with us. You either know it and can convey your smarts or you can't. You need to be able to defend anything and everything on your resume in intimate detail. You need to be able to think on the fly and be prepared to give a reasonable and well-thought answer to questions in areas where you may have had no exposure to in the past. Is it fair? Hell no! But that's the way it is...