• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

WSJ - Why $100 Oil Can't Float

Joined
5/4/07
Messages
176
Points
28
Why $100 Oil Can't Float

Justifications for the Price, Like Supply and the Dollar, Crumble Under Economics

By CYRUS SANATI
November 8, 2007; Page C14

With oil flirting with $100 a barrel, there seems to be no stopping the dizzying ascent of black gold. In such a frothy market, it may seem old-fashioned to talk about supply and demand. But they and other fundamentals give a clear message: The price is too high to be sustainable.
There are 10 solid reasons why:

1.
Supply above ground is abundant. The amount of oil in storage tanks around the world is near all-time highs -- 4.2 billion barrels at the end of June in the industrialized countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development alone, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Falling inventories in the U.S. have received a lot of attention, and the EIA does predict slightly lower stocks by year-end. But this has more to do with inventory management than a lack of supply.

2.
Supply below ground is abundant. The world's proven reserves are now at 1.4 trillion barrels, up 12% in the past 10 years, according to BP.
That's not even counting the estimated 1.7 trillion barrels of oil locked in Venezuela's Orinoco tar sands. Combined, that comes to a century of production at the current rate.

3.
Production is set to increase. Sustained high oil prices have encouraged drilling. There are 45% more oil rigs in service today than there were three years ago. New rigs are more productive than old ones and new technology is helping to squeeze more oil out of old fields.

4.
The cost of production is much less than $100 a barrel. Even with oil-services costs soaring, Royal Dutch Shell's lifting cost per barrel of oil equivalent in 2006 was about $9, according to energy research firm John S. Herold. Extracting oil costs Saudi Aramco, the Saudi Arabian producer, an estimated $4 to $5 a barrel.
The full cost of new production -- including both capital and operating-cost components -- in the most challenging oil fields, for example in Canada's oil sands, is perhaps $30 a barrel. Oil prices can fall heavily without making any of this production uneconomic.

5.
Iranian exports aren't likely to be cut. The U.S. is in practice unlikely to take military action against an adversary three times the size of Iraq. And with oil exports accounting for 50% of Iran's gross domestic product and 90% of its hard-currency earnings, a self-imposed cut in exports would be self-destructive.
In any event, the world has the equivalent of nearly three years of Iranian production in storage, according to research from Oppenheimer. This risk shouldn't be a big factor in oil prices.

6.
High prices are pulling back demand. Oil consumption in the U.S. fell by 1.3% in 2006 and world-wide demand grew a measly 0.6%, according to BP.
World-wide, demand this year is expected to be flat compared with last year. Exxon Mobil cut its long-term forecast for oil-consumption growth this week.

7.
High prices are forcing governments to cut subsidies. Iran is rationing gasoline, and last week China ordered a 10% increase in oil-product prices. That should curb demand growth, too.

8.
Energy from oil is looking expensive compared with energy from gas. Oil by the barrel has usually traded at six to 10 times the price of natural gas (measured per million British thermal units). It is currently at 13 times.

9.
The weak dollar is a poor excuse for high oil prices. Since Aug. 22, the dollar is down by only 8% against a basket of currencies while the oil price has risen by 40%.

10.
Speculation is artificially boosting prices. A speculator needs to put down only $4 per barrel as margin to bet on the oil price in futures markets. The net volume of open crude-oil contracts held by financial players is up 50% since August, when the credit crunch made it harder to make leveraged bets in some other markets. This looks like short-term, hot money.


URL for this article:
Why $100 Oil Can't Float - WSJ.com
 
...

it will go beyond $100 as USD goes south.

please do not forget psychology effects. traders will jet it up and then short it back.
 
I see that the 1.4 trillion of reserves does not include the Orinoco tar sands. I presume by now this does include the Canadian oil sands. My question is: does this include the 800 billion to a trillion in oil shale here in the U.S. out around Colorado? It has not been economic to extract this oil so far. But you can see how this would increase world reserves dramatically.
 
Regarding reserves, and how this impacts the price, the question is - how long term are we talking here? The article seems to concentrate a lot on the short term, and some of what they say sounds reasonable; I don't know, it's been a few years since I worked in the business.

In the long term, I think it will go down because eventually substitutes will come into play, simply because if oil stays too elevated in price for too long, other non-oil power sources will become economical.

Their point about reserves is a bit of a red-herring; it has nothing to do with prices in the short term, and perhaps not even in the long-term. Those reserves aren't coming from new finds. Instead, it's the fact that technology is making it possible to extract previously useless reserves. But that's invariably going to cause the baseline $/barrel to extract to go up. So ironically, reserves go up only so long as oil stays at an elevated price.
 
Substitution? When?

Natural gas??

Regarding reserves, and how this impacts the price, the question is - how long term are we talking here? The article seems to concentrate a lot on the short term, and some of what they say sounds reasonable; I don't know, it's been a few years since I worked in the business.

In the long term, I think it will go down because eventually substitutes will come into play, simply because if oil stays too elevated in price for too long, other non-oil power sources will become economical.

Their point about reserves is a bit of a red-herring; it has nothing to do with prices in the short term, and perhaps not even in the long-term. Those reserves aren't coming from new finds. Instead, it's the fact that technology is making it possible to extract previously useless reserves. But that's invariably going to cause the baseline $/barrel to extract to go up. So ironically, reserves go up only so long as oil stays at an elevated price.
 
Back
Top