@
bronson I heard last thursday (the 10th).
Honestly the thing is i'm open to either city. i've been to both london/hk and new york and they're both cities that i believe i would be extremely happy living in. I've heard LSE actually has pretty high placement in asia especially HK, as there are not many top schools around there that produce students that can speak english (not to be mean), and the uk has a pretty close connection with hk. that would definitely be a plus for me if i was able to get a job in hk after graduation. but i mean ny, london, hk are all wonderful cities in their own way, and i feel you can't go wrong with any one of them
in terms of what i want to study, i feel i would really enjoy the intellectual rigor of the mfe. As I majored in finance as an undergrad(with a math minor if that means anything), and i felt like the finance courses in general were kind of 'soft' if that makes any sense. i'm interested in quant finance in general, but it seems a lot of the mfe career path is geared more towards risk and support roles(obviously there is also quant trading and the such but it seems like a pretty even split) and mfin is geared more towards traditional front office type roles as well as other things such as asset management and management consulting. and if that is the case, i think would enjoy a career as a latter as opposed to a more support oriented career. i may be way offbase with this, and if so correct me if i'm wrong.
but i guess what i just wanted to know was if there was a clear cut choice between them. because obviously they have are very different - mfe vs mfin, nyc vs london, cornell vs lse.
but just to compare if i was to choose between studying harvard vs studying at say my local community college. even though they may have diff programs and diff locations... i think there would be a general consensus to which option i should choose there..