• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Default is Inevitable

Joined
6/3/06
Messages
731
Points
28
Percentage of External Debt to GDP

1. Ireland - 1,267%
2. Switzerland - 422.7%
3. United Kingdom - 408.3%
4. Netherlands - 365%
5. Belgium - 320.2%
6. Denmark - 298%
7. Austria - 252.6%
8. France - 236%
9. Portugal - 214.4%
10. Hong Kong - 205.8%
11. Norway - 199%
12. Sweden - 194.3%
13. Finland - 188.5%
14. Germany - 178.5%
15. Spain - 171%
16. Greece - 161.%
17. Italy - 126.7%
18. Australia - 111.3%
19. Hungary - 105.7%
20. United States - 94.3 %

Percentage of External Debt to GDP: Default is Inevitable
 
Interesting ranking. Some countries came as a surprise to me, especially the Scandinavians and Suisse. I guess strong social policies have to take some resources.
It would be even more intriguing to see the rate of change in debt accumulation for these countries in last 10-20 years ...

By the way, some people would argue that to end this uncertainty, better a couple of defaults and a more transparent playing field. The theory has it's merits.
 
It's difficult to understand this on any sort of theoretical basis. Historically speaking, this is in many ways a consequence of the breakdown of Bretton Woods in the early '70s. The makeshift structure of the fiat dollar and floating exchange rates, along with the new dominance of finance both nationally and globally, along with decreased tax levels at the upper end, have led to this situation. Incidentally, what I've described in my last sentence is what makes quant finance possible, is the political and financial structure quants and quant firms operate in. Despite attempts to prop it up -- by "quantitative easing" (i.e., injections of new fiat currency) -- it looks like it's headed for oblivion.

Because of the inter-related structure of both finance and the flow of goods, it's unlikely economies like Greece and Spain can be quarantined. For instance, German and French banks own hundreds of billions in Greek bonds. Incidentally, the "bailout" guarantees agreed to by Eurozone members are designed to ensure that these banks do not suffer if the bonds default. If Greece defaults, these banks get bailed out. But what about if Spain defaults? And Ireland defaults? Then what? Furthermore, Germany is an export-driven economy: what does it do if some of its major trading partners are in serious trouble? These are systemic structural problems at the heart of the Eurozone and at the heart of the global economy. No alternative has been proposed. But when it comes crashing down, then some new piece of architecture will be required -- not just trying to prop up something that has already collapsed.
 
There's a good article by Wolfgang Munchau on European debt:

Is the eurozone insolvent? In the past few weeks, we have all focused on the solvency of Greece, Spain and Portugal. But we never seriously questioned the solvency of those who actually guarantee all those southern European debts.

The first thing to note is that you cannot answer that question with a cursory reference to the debt-to-gross domestic product ratios of eurozone countries. This macro perspective is of little use here. Those numbers tell us that the eurozone is in a better position than the US, the UK or Japan. The problem is that those headline numbers exclude contingent debt and the interconnectedness of financial flows.

In last week’s column I remarked that it was no accident that the eurozone created a special purpose vehicle to manage this bail-out. It is not just the name that reminds us of those notorious financial structures that brought us the subprime crisis. There are in fact substantive parallels.

Like a dodgy subprime collateralised debt obligation, the eurozone’s SPV lacks transparency. The operational rules are not clear, and have been subject to disputes among member states since political leaders announced agreement. If you want to understand it, you had better read the small print.

... As long as the eurozone governments can generate sufficient tax revenues, all is well. But if that were to stop, the eurozone’s debt edifice might break down like a house of cards. Even a 150 per cent debt-to-GDP ratio would be feasible if the eurozone had an intelligent growth strategy. But it never did, and it still does not.
 
Back
Top