• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

When Model Risk becomes Model Fraud

AZPalta

CMU MSCF Alum
Joined
4/24/10
Messages
28
Points
13
Been following this story for a long while given that Barr Rosenberg was a major contributor to Quant Asset Management as an industry and a field of thought. (Capital Ideas by Peter L. Bernstein for those interested).

http://www.pionline.com/article/20110922/DAILYREG/110929952

Punishment seems justified, given the crime was hiding the mistake not just using a bad model .
 
Been following this story for a long while given that Barr Rosenberg was a major contributor to Quant Asset Management as an industry and a field of thought. (Capital Ideas by Peter L. Bernstein for those interested).

http://www.pionline.com/article/20110922/DAILYREG/110929952

Punishment seems justified, given the crime was hiding the mistake not just using a bad model .

Barr Rosenberg was the founder of BARRA.
 
Actually, SQA has put up a program (coming up in NYC on April 26, 2012) on Barr Rosenberg and repercussions of this SEC case on the quant industry. Jeremy Baskin, CEO of AXA Rosenberg, is one of the panelists.
http://www.sqa-us.org
 
One way this case is interesting is that he appears to have been caught by someone in his own firm, something that is quite common for low-mid level offences and he did something that was pretty flagrant and had a paper trial of him trying to cover up. From that point he was a dead man walking.

It's really hard to see how a regulator could catch him, firstly because they don't often examine models, but also because they can't, because they are very rarely smart enough.

Model design and choice is a matter of judgement and unless you're dumb enough to put in an email "don't tell anyone about the hole", it's hard to see you being caught. Often for simplicity one chooses volatility to be a constant determined by option prices, sometimes you add jumps, what distribution do you choose for these ? None have universal answers, that allow a 3rd party to say "you chose that because it gave the result you wanted"
 
Back
Top