2025 QuantNet Rankings of Quantitative Finance, Financial Engineering Programs

2025.svg
We are pleased to announce the publication of the QuantNet 2025 Rankings of Financial Engineering programs.
The full 2025 QuantNet MFE ranking is released here
For comparison, the 2024 QuantNet MFE ranking is here.
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
QuantCoach said:
I really think career service is overrated. I would pick brand name >> career service anytime.
Click to expand...
This may work for domestic students who have advantages in languages, visa, cultural awareness, etc. For international students, they can barely survive with a lot of help. When career services is a bare minimum, $100K for a degree is a very hard sell.
QuantCoach said:
However, the truth is Columbia MFE barely has any brand name either.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate? I think many prospective students are banking on the Columbia MFE name to open doors for them.
 
I mean I wouldn't want to hire anyone that can barely survive without a lot of help. I'm of the opinion that those who complain about career service are those who don't take initiative on their own. It's much easier to blame other people than yourself.

At least personally, when I interview a candidate and see their from Columbia MFE, my first reaction is "oh they couldn't get a great job out of undergrad". It doesn't have brand name because it's not difficult to get into and most of the students are not elite. The three pools of candidates I typically see are 1) HYPSM+ undergrads in a STEM degree 2) HYPSM+ PhDs in a STEM degree 3) top 10 QN MFE programs. Relative to the candidate pool, there's nothing special about the name.
 
Update the second post. Click on the TableView of the ranking to see the side-by-side comparison.

Andy Nguyen

Post in thread '2025 QuantNet Rankings of Quantitative Finance, Financial Engineering Programs'

How to Decode the QuantNet Rankings for Deeper Insights

QuantNet rankings are more than just numbers—they’re a gateway to understanding program quality, career outcomes, and earning potential. Here’s how you can unlock the key insights:

1. Look Beyond the Rank: Focus on Total Score
The Total Score offers a richer perspective than the rank alone. For instance, the gap between #7 and #9 might be small, while the difference between #9 and #11 could be more significant. Use this score to make more informed comparisons.

2. Dive Into Employment Outcomes
Employment...
 
LinearAlgebraLover said:
Appears to unfortunately be a fairly accurate and consistent post with nearly all information regarding the program. Truly is only hanging on by the schools reputation, it really is a shame that career services could care less whether the students are employed. I do wonder if that 100% employment after 3 months is somehow inflated, it seems suspicious.
Click to expand...
Sorry to hear that. It appears to be a widespread concern with Columbia MFE. A quick search on LinkedIn will show many, many of the recent December 2023 graduates still without a job. Anyone is welcome to contact them and verify this.
Too bad that too many applicants just apply based on the brand name without doing any proper research. Let's this be a $100K lesson for them.
 
A quick look at Princeton's student directory tells that all candidates had work experience in quant domain ( either internship or full-time) Pick any resume from their resume book and you can validate this.

I am talking top firms in the likes of optiver, IMC, Goldman etc. (esp class of 2026, so its getting more competitive than ever ). What even is the purpose of a masters program if it exclusively picks students who are already excelling in the area of that program. Regardless of how good or bad you teach the outcome of that program is going to be exceptional. The candidates already had the skills to secure quant roles without that program. So this is basically get into US scheme for already exceptional students. How does one evaluate such programs then?


Tigga said:
The Quantnet ranking is dissected by Youtubers.
Click to expand...
 
tired_aspirant said:
A quick look at Princeton's student directory tells that all candidates had work experience in quant domain ( either internship or full-time) Pick any resume from their resume book and you can validate this.

I am talking top firms in the likes of optiver, IMC, Goldman etc. (esp class of 2026, so its getting more competitive than ever ). What even is the purpose of a masters program if it exclusively picks students who are already excelling in the area of that program. Regardless of how good or bad you teach the outcome of that program is going to be exceptional. The candidates already had the skills to secure quant roles without that program. So this is basically get into US scheme for already exceptional students. How does one evaluate such programs then?
Click to expand...
good question. total chicken and the egg situation. Is Princeton driving the salaries? Or is it that their students are top applicants regardless of their graduate school.
 

Similar threads

Andy Nguyen
2024 QuantNet Rankings of Financial Engineering (MFE) Programs
2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
61K
Andy Nguyen
Andy Nguyen
Andy Nguyen
  • Sticky
2024 QuantNet Rankings of UK Quant MSc Programs
2
Replies
32
Views
9K
Andy Nguyen
Andy Nguyen
Andy Nguyen
2023 QuantNet Rankings of Financial Engineering (MFE) Programs
4 5 6
Replies
111
Views
92K
Lukee
Lukee
Andy Nguyen
2022 QuantNet Rankings of Financial Engineering (MFE) Programs
2
Replies
26
Views
25K
Andy Nguyen
Andy Nguyen
Andy Nguyen
  • Article Article
2021 QuantNet Rankings of Financial Engineering (MFE) Programs
2 3
Replies
55
Views
43K
BoY
B
Back
Top Bottom