The full 2025 QuantNet MFE ranking is released here
For comparison, the 2024 QuantNet MFE ranking is here.
Last edited:
It is always better to have meaningful data. I definitely would love to share them when I have access to them.@Andy Nguyen out of curiosity, would you ever consider posting more information about compensation distributions. In particular, I think it'd be interesting to see median compensation.
To me, the three main observations are: MIT jumping back to 5, Courant falling heavily and GT entering top 10. I think all of them can be explained by the employment figures, it was a bad market in general.What is everyone thinking about the 2025 rankings? Curious to hear people thoughts on some of the big jumps in the ranking this year.
@LinearAlgebraLover @twood @zephyrus @MikeLawrence
2025 Rankings takes inputs as belowCan anyone help me understand what does the 2025 data stand for? Because Fall 2025 admissions are still going on and current batch ( started in Aug 2024) is batch of 2024. What exactly 2025 data represent? Example 28% acceptance rate for NYU Tandon 2025
The survey sent to programs follows a standardized format for calculating and reporting placement data at graduation and the three-month mark, a process we’ve maintained consistently for many years. Programs are responsible for surveying their graduates and providing accurate and truthful data.For the employment “3 months” data, how was this captured? Was this only considered for related careers to FE or is this any employment? Some jumps in employment from post graduation to 3 months are a bit large
Looking at the TableView of the rankings, Columbia MFE stands out with the jump from 37% to 100% for 3 months. Does this look off to you?Some jumps in employment from post graduation to 3 months are a bit large
really?Let’s cut to the chase shall we: 260k (very impressive) average first year comp on a 125k investment doesn’t seem like a great ROI given the other options… Needless to mention the positive skew of these distributions. Oh and an extra semester of unemployment… Do you think adding ROI as a factor is important? @Andy Nguyen
Sorry, what?really?
$260K first year … over let’s say 30 years. Seems like a great investment.
Factoring in ROI when evaluating programs is certainly a valid approach, and it’s likely that many applicants already perform their own mental ROI calculations by considering variables like tuition, compensation, cost of living, and other factors.Let’s cut to the chase shall we: 260k (very impressive) average first year comp on a 125k investment doesn’t seem like a great ROI given the other options… Needless to mention the positive skew of these distributions. Oh and an extra semester of unemployment… Do you think adding ROI as a factor is important? @Andy Nguyen
Appears to unfortunately be a fairly accurate and consistent post with nearly all information regarding the program. Truly is only hanging on by the schools reputation, it really is a shame that career services could care less whether the students are employed. I do wonder if that 100% employment after 3 months is somehow inflated, it seems suspicious.By @MRoss
Mark Ross on LinkedIn: WARNING: Anti-College Rant INCOMING... 😤 Columbia Universities Master's…
WARNING: Anti-College Rant INCOMING... 😤 Columbia Universities Master's in Financial Engineering program ranked #9 on QuantNet's list this year. TBH, without…www.linkedin.com
What other schools do you think have a better ROI? Maybe Baruch? To me it seems like only Baruch offers a better ROI.Let’s cut to the chase shall we: 260k (very impressive) average first year comp on a 125k investment doesn’t seem like a great ROI given the other options… Needless to mention the positive skew of these distributions. Oh and an extra semester of unemployment… Do you think adding ROI as a factor is important? @Andy Nguyen