2025 QuantNet Rankings of Quantitative Finance, Financial Engineering Programs

2025.svg
We are pleased to announce the publication of the QuantNet 2025 Rankings of Financial Engineering programs.
The full 2025 QuantNet MFE ranking is released here
For comparison, the 2024 QuantNet MFE ranking is here.
 
Last edited:
For the employment “3 months” data, how was this captured? Was this only considered for related careers to FE or is this any employment? Some jumps in employment from post graduation to 3 months are a bit large🤔
 
What is everyone thinking about the 2025 rankings? Curious to hear people thoughts on some of the big jumps in the ranking this year.
@LinearAlgebraLover @twood @zephyrus @MikeLawrence
To me, the three main observations are: MIT jumping back to 5, Courant falling heavily and GT entering top 10. I think all of them can be explained by the employment figures, it was a bad market in general.
 
Can anyone help me understand what does the 2025 data stand for? Because Fall 2025 admissions are still going on and current batch ( started in Aug 2024) is batch of 2024. What exactly 2025 data represent? Example 28% acceptance rate for NYU Tandon 2025
 
Can anyone help me understand what does the 2025 data stand for? Because Fall 2025 admissions are still going on and current batch ( started in Aug 2024) is batch of 2024. What exactly 2025 data represent? Example 28% acceptance rate for NYU Tandon 2025
2025 Rankings takes inputs as below
  • Admissions data for students starting in Spring and/or Fall 2024.
  • Employment data for graduates in Dec 2023 or May 2024 (depends on programs).
For example, looking at NYU Tandon acceptance rate in the 2025 rankings, the 28% is based on those starting in Fall 2024.
This same rule applies across the data in our rankings.
 
For the employment “3 months” data, how was this captured? Was this only considered for related careers to FE or is this any employment? Some jumps in employment from post graduation to 3 months are a bit large🤔
The survey sent to programs follows a standardized format for calculating and reporting placement data at graduation and the three-month mark, a process we’ve maintained consistently for many years. Programs are responsible for surveying their graduates and providing accurate and truthful data.

If you come across figures that seem incorrect, we encourage you to bring it to the program’s attention. They are best positioned to verify and confirm the data.
 
Some jumps in employment from post graduation to 3 months are a bit large🤔
Looking at the TableView of the rankings, Columbia MFE stands out with the jump from 37% to 100% for 3 months. Does this look off to you?
Blink twice if yes.
I heard rumors about it in the past and looking at their recent reviews, it's hard to believe the 100% placement.
 
Let’s cut to the chase shall we: 260k (very impressive) average first year comp on a 125k investment doesn’t seem like a great ROI given the other options… Needless to mention the positive skew of these distributions. Oh and an extra semester of unemployment… Do you think adding ROI as a factor is important? @Andy Nguyen
really?

$260K first year … over let’s say 30 years. Seems like a great investment.
 
Let’s cut to the chase shall we: 260k (very impressive) average first year comp on a 125k investment doesn’t seem like a great ROI given the other options… Needless to mention the positive skew of these distributions. Oh and an extra semester of unemployment… Do you think adding ROI as a factor is important? @Andy Nguyen
Factoring in ROI when evaluating programs is certainly a valid approach, and it’s likely that many applicants already perform their own mental ROI calculations by considering variables like tuition, compensation, cost of living, and other factors.

In fact, numerous publications already rank colleges based on ROI, providing valuable insights for prospective students. Programs with lower tuition and high comp like Baruch usually performs very well in those rankings.
Here is an example
 
By @MRoss
Appears to unfortunately be a fairly accurate and consistent post with nearly all information regarding the program. Truly is only hanging on by the schools reputation, it really is a shame that career services could care less whether the students are employed. I do wonder if that 100% employment after 3 months is somehow inflated, it seems suspicious.
 
Let’s cut to the chase shall we: 260k (very impressive) average first year comp on a 125k investment doesn’t seem like a great ROI given the other options… Needless to mention the positive skew of these distributions. Oh and an extra semester of unemployment… Do you think adding ROI as a factor is important? @Andy Nguyen
What other schools do you think have a better ROI? Maybe Baruch? To me it seems like only Baruch offers a better ROI.
 
Back
Top Bottom