• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!
Columbia University - Masters in Financial Engineering

Columbia MFE Columbia MFE admissions results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vixus
  • Start date Start date
If you watch the Tracker closely, you will find some very interesting instances where a member got admitted by a top 5 program but rejected by a top 15. I'm curious to see if a top 15 program knows that an applicant will most likely get in a top 5, do they bother admit him and get turned down? Or do they reject him to keep their acceptance rate low?
Just some thought.
I don't know the reason for this phenomenon, but your reasoning does apply to firms coming for hiring in Indian colleges. If a firm's comp isn't that great (and they are aware of the fact) they will most likely reject candidates with a > 9 CGPA or a stacked resume, because it is more likely that the candidate will either bag a better offer or leave for Master's very soon and they don't want to expend resources on training someone who they know will leave.

So it is definitely plausible.
 
If you watch the Tracker closely, you will find some very interesting instances where a member got admitted by a top 5 program but rejected by a top 15. I'm curious to see if a top 15 program knows that an applicant will most likely get in a top 5, do they bother admit him and get turned down? Or do they reject him to keep their acceptance rate low?
Just some thought.
Hi Andy. Since CU MAFN has a representative in our community now, do you think someone from CU MFE would be interested in coming in and answering questions as well?
 
If you watch the Tracker closely, you will find some very interesting instances where a member got admitted by a top 5 program but rejected by a top 15. I'm curious to see if a top 15 program knows that an applicant will most likely get in a top 5, do they bother admit him and get turned down? Or do they reject him to keep their acceptance rate low?
Just some thought.
I understand your point. I know that this phenomenon does occur in MBA admissions.

But then....Columbia is itself a top 5. And while I possess a solid background I am for sure not at the Princeton/Baruch tier.

Going into the application process, I THOUGHT I was comfortably at the Columbia, UCB, NYU (Fin Math), Chicago level and that if I applied to all of them I would at least get into one. Turns out I probably overestimated myself lol. So far, the only interaction I have had with theses schools was an interview with a UCB alum last Friday. Radio silence from the other four.
 
I understand your point. I know that this phenomenon does occur in MBA admissions.

But then....Columbia is itself a top 5. And while I possess a solid background I am for sure not at the Princeton/Baruch tier.

Going into the application process, I THOUGHT I was comfortably at the Columbia, UCB, NYU (Fin Math), Chicago level and that if I applied to all of them I would at least get into one. Turns out I probably overestimated myself lol. So far, the only interaction I have had with theses schools was an interview with a UCB alum last Friday. Radio silence from the other four.
On the same boat. No hear back from Chicago/Columbia/NYU MFE
 
Just curious, are you applying from Hong Kong too? I wonder if that could be a disadvantage lol.
Nationality wise yes. I am a Hong Kong citizen, but my college education is in the U.S. I don't think nationality is a difference maker, but I can't say anything about the nuances. However, I do know that a lot of these programs have a very high international student percentage according their class profiles.
 
If you watch the Tracker closely, you will find some very interesting instances where a member got admitted by a top 5 program but rejected by a top 15. I'm curious to see if a top 15 program knows that an applicant will most likely get in a top 5, do they bother admit him and get turned down? Or do they reject him to keep their acceptance rate low?
Just some thought.
This is also pretty common in undergrad admissions, they call it 'yield protection'. Higher yield rate and lower acceptance rates make the programs look more selective
 
Nationality wise yes. I am a Hong Kong citizen, but my college education is in the U.S. I don't think nationality is a difference maker, but I can't say anything about the nuances. However, I do know that a lot of these programs have a very high international student percentage according their class profiles.
I see I see. There's a reason why I bring this up. I once spoke with somebody who used to work in a T7 MBA admissions team.

So how they evaluate applicants is that they would put them into geographic & functional buckets and compare them with others within the same bucket. They don't advertise this publicly but they also effectively implement soft country quotas (at least during the time when she worked in MBA admissions).

I am not sure if MFE admission teams following the same practice though.
 
I see I see. There's a reason why I bring this up. I once spoke with somebody who used to work in a T7 MBA admissions team.

So how they evaluate applicants is that they would put them into geographic & functional buckets and compare them with others within the same bucket. They don't advertise this publicly but they also effectively implement soft country quotas (at least during the time when she worked in MBA admissions).

I am not sure if MFE admission teams following the same practice though.
That's interesting. I think admissions vary from program to program, even within the same school. I do know that many programs evaluate international applicants differently, but I have also seen that some programs have a significant number of students from China.
Moreover, MBA is a little different from my perspective. MBA graduates typically take on managerial roles, while graduates of MFE programs tend to take on functional roles.
 
Last edited:
Sure... The moment I discovered that Princeton received almost 1200 applications or thereabout, I knew it was gonna be tough this year. Some of us didn't even attempt Princeton, we were probably discouraged by the single digit admit rate.

It is what it is bro. We move!!
wow 1200 for 30-40 seats? good luck to all those who have applied!
 
Has Columbia started to send declines? I just saw somebody put declined in the tracker.
 
This is also pretty common in undergrad admissions, they call it 'yield protection'. Higher yield rate and lower acceptance rates make the programs look more selective
Is the yield rate a factor in the ranking of a school or program? Does it help them get the right kind of students they are looking for, or is it just something that makes them look more selective?
 
Is the yield rate a factor in the ranking of a school or program? Does it help them get the right kind of students they are looking for, or is it just something that makes them look more selective?
I assume for example if a applicants if clearly good for Princeton MFE program, lower tier programs simply would classify those applicants as overqualified, and just simply wouldn't give them a offer to maintain more selective percentages.
 
I assume for example if a applicants if clearly good for Princeton MFE program, lower tier programs simply would classify those applicants as overqualified, and just simply wouldn't give them a offer to maintain more selective percentages.
Understood. But wouldn't the program lose out on a potentially good candidate? For example, someone qualified for Princeton with no scholarship may not be able to join, just because it's unaffordable to him/her.
 
Understood. But wouldn't the program lose out on a potentially good candidate? For example, someone qualified for Princeton with no scholarship may not be able to join, just because it's unaffordable to him/her.
yea its a game that all colleges in the US play. they like to keep their acceptance rate low but they also cant over admit with the worry that if everyone accepts then they wont have space. they will deny people who are going to go to better schools. happens all the time
 
This is killing me. I'm in Columbia and applied via MS Express way back in November. Now I'm watching other people getting admitted first lol. Would be a great story to be like one of the only people rejected from MS express
I also applied through MS express, still waiting for the results……
 
whats ms express?
The MS Express program affords highly qualified undergraduate applicants from SEAS, Columbia College, Barnard, and General Studies the opportunity to apply to any MS program in engineering at SEAS and matriculate in the semester immediately following their graduation. Interested eligible alumni of these schools may also apply within three years of graduation.
 
Back
Top