Could u suggest any good online course/websites/books for python
Yes, but it's still not as intuitive. data.table is VERY clean and always gives me what I expect. I can do very quick ad hoc data exploration with it. Part of it is that I haven't fully learned pandas, but that's also partially pandas' fault.
<option name="ExpandOption">
<param type="double" descr="expansion scale">e</param>
<param type="double" descr="outlay">I</param>
<param type="double" descr="interest rate">r</param>
<var name="V" descr="project value">
<lower>e*V-exp(-r*(T-t))*I</lower>
</var>
<payoff>max(e*V-I)</payoff>
<american value="false"></american>
</option>Umm, there's a library for practically every standard thing in Python, so yes. There is in fact an XML parsing library (several in fact). And with the right imports, it's also quite easy to parse the mathematical expressions.
My question was serious. google, LOL.
What do you mean generate code? Like JAXB generate a class that can parse this code automatically in Python?
using System;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Reflection.Emit;
//djd
// Generate a generic class, add a method and store in a dll
class DemoAssemblyBuilder
{
public static void Main()
{
AssemblyName assName = new AssemblyName("MeaningOfLife");
AssemblyBuilder assBuilder =
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.DefineDynamicAssembly(assName, AssemblyBuilderAccess.RunAndSave);
ModuleBuilder mb = assBuilder.DefineDynamicModule(assName.Name, assName.Name + ".dll");
TypeBuilder tb = mb.DefineType("GaudeamusIgitur", TypeAttributes.Public);
GenericTypeParameterBuilder[] genericParams = tb.DefineGenericParameters("T1", "T2");
tb.DefineField("key", genericParams[0], FieldAttributes.Public);
tb.DefineField("value", genericParams[0], FieldAttributes.Public);
MethodBuilder method = tb.DefineMethod("Salve", MethodAttributes.Public, typeof(void),Type.EmptyTypes);
ILGenerator gen = method.GetILGenerator();
gen.EmitWriteLine((string)"42");
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
Type t = tb.CreateType();
assBuilder.Save(assName.Name + ".dll");
}
}
using
System;
public
classClass1
{
publicstaticvoid Main()
{
GaudeamusIgitur<int, int> g = newGaudeamusIgitur<int, int>();
g.key = 1;
g.value = 42;
g.Salve();
}
}Yes, maybe you've heard of it:You're a bit touchy today
Dynamically creating a class is really standard (and eminently Google-able). The DLL part is usually not done, and kind of not the right mindset. You COULD compile it down to C dynamically and load that, depending on the type of code, see for example Numba.
Too general. Please see my C# example above to see what I mean.
