- Joined
- 6/6/08
- Messages
- 1,194
- Points
- 58
I am not familiar with any program in Boston. If you're looking for an MS degree that you can use as a stamp on your resume, it shouldn't matter whether it takes 1 or 2 years, and the knowledge you'll get at any university program aside from perhaps the very finest ones that literally have practitioners teaching the courses and hiring students right out will be suspect at best.
Remember: universities exist to turn a profit, and the easiest thing for them to do is to take already existing coursework (stochastic calculus from the physics department, programming from the comp sci, bunch of stuff from econ/finance) and lump them all together and call it a degree. If you get into a top program that has classes taught by practitioners who teach you the skills needed to succeed directly at their company, that's one thing. But gift-wrapped data sets or daily closes downloaded from Yahoo Finance are a far cry from the real world compared to the ugly and dirty data you find in the real world.
IMO you need to find the best school that prepares you for dealing with the ugly data of the real world, because that'll most likely be your first job if you want to ever be a quant.
Remember: universities exist to turn a profit, and the easiest thing for them to do is to take already existing coursework (stochastic calculus from the physics department, programming from the comp sci, bunch of stuff from econ/finance) and lump them all together and call it a degree. If you get into a top program that has classes taught by practitioners who teach you the skills needed to succeed directly at their company, that's one thing. But gift-wrapped data sets or daily closes downloaded from Yahoo Finance are a far cry from the real world compared to the ugly and dirty data you find in the real world.
IMO you need to find the best school that prepares you for dealing with the ugly data of the real world, because that'll most likely be your first job if you want to ever be a quant.