• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

What is going on at Bear Stearns ?

I don't think the Fed will let BSC go down the crapper... Something or someone will bail them out... but it's going to be ugly.
 
Can't help but wonder if there will be a Bear Stearns come Monday.
 
It may become Bear Chase Morgans

In all seriousness, while all of us are amazed by the developments at Bear Stearns, keep in mind that this may have dire consequences on many of us who work or looking for work in the financial industry.
Something happens to Bear will have domino effects on other firms and the general markets. Deteriorating market condition is never a welcome sign for MFE graduates even at good programs like Baruch, NYU, CMU

I guess I learned today that things can change overnight and job today, gone tomorrow so I don't take anything for granted.

Lehman said that it will cut 1400 jobs (5%) so Bear is not the only thing we should worry about.
 
A good summary of the events today.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080314/bear_stearns_q_a.html

After Bear Stearns, Who May Be Next?


Bear Stearns' S.O.S. to Fed Raises Worries About Which Bank Might Be Next
NEW YORK (AP) -- After Bear Stearns Cos. said Friday it will have to borrow money through JPMorgan Chase & Co., backed by the New York Federal Reserve, investors are curious: What does this mean for other banks, and who might be next?

Q: Is this going to happen to other investment banks?

A: Nobody knows for sure, but it could. Until proven otherwise, the market will probably act as if there are more near-collapses to come -- just as it did on Friday, when investors sold off their bank holdings and sent the Dow Jones industrial average down 200 points.
"Even though Bear was probably on the fringe, pushing the envelope anyway, traders are saying that because it happened, it could happen to somebody else," said Brandon Thomas, chief investment officer for Portfolio Management Consultants, the investment arm of Envestnet.

Q: Which other institutions might need funding?
A:
Bear Stearns has been the weakling among the five reigning Wall Street investment banks: Bear, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs. Many market watchers will recall that last spring, Bear was the first of these institutions to reveal big problems with mortgage-linked debt when it had to pump cash into two hemorrhaging hedge funds.
Also, Bear is the smallest of the five big investment banks, the least diversified, and the biggest issuer of mortgage-backed securities.
But Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. appears to be an investment bank that investors are very worried about right now -- mainly because it is the investment bank that is most similar to Bear in structure and exposure. Its stock dropped more than 14 percent on Friday.
Banks gave Lehman a vote of confidence of sorts, however, on Friday -- Lehman Brothers said its new credit facility was "substantially oversubscribed," and that some of world's largest banks participated.
Other banks certainly have their own troubles -- Merrill Lynch, for one, wrote down more than $14 billion in the fourth quarter as the value of bonds and debt backed by souring mortgages fell.
However, "there's not the same questioning of their franchise. It's not anyone saying, what are they going to do for a living next year," said Tanya Azarchs, S&P banking analyst. "At the same time, though ... the markets are very nervous, very skittish. Asset prices are very volatile. The repo markets are very tight, very illiquid. When the repo markets are illiquid, things can get very unpredictable."
The repo, or repurchase, markets are temporary loan markets that are relied upon by banks, hedge funds and other investors to invest their extra money or borrow against collateral.

Q: What will happen to Bear Stearns?
A:
Few industry experts believe the 28-day loan will be enough for Bear to become liquid on its own again -- most are viewing it as delaying tactic as Bear and the Fed figure out how to proceed.
It is possible Bear will be bought, perhaps by JPMorgan. If that happens, the buyer would have take over Bear Stearns' $176 billion worth of distressed securities and its $42 billion in loans -- not a rosy prospect for even a healthy bank. Furthermore, there are regulatory issues that may arise if a commercial bank wants to buy Bear's troubled assets.
Another scenario is that the Fed attempts to organize an orderly winding down of Bear Stearns into a much smaller company by selling off its assets.

Q: How is Bear's loan different than other steps troubled financial institutions have taken?
A:
Bear Stearns is not the first company to seek out cash -- Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley have pulled in several billion dollars by selling stakes to outside investors, including foreign governments, while the bond insurer MBIA Inc. sold a significant stake in itself to JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers and other investors.
But Bear Stearns' agreement with JPMorgan is not a stake sale -- it's financing planned and backed by the U.S. government.

Q: Why can't the Fed just let Bear Stearns collapse?
A:
Typically the Federal Reserve bails out struggling commercial banks, but because Bear Stearns is inextricably linked to a huge number of institutions, a failure could cause "a ripple effect," said Ali Samad-Khan, head of operational risk management consulting for the Enterprise Risk Management practice at Towers Perrin.
"They probably fall into the too-big-to-fail category," he said. "The fact is, they recognized that this is an important enough issue for them to get involved in."
Bear Stearns is interconnected with other banks, hedge funds and investors that are its "counterparties." Essentially, if Bear can't meet obligations to these counterparties, those counterparties will lose their money.
Big banks like Citigroup Inc. could see big losses but are probably large and diversified enough to survive them. But smaller players on the edges -- particularly hedge funds -- are at risk of going under if Bear can't repay them. A Carlyle Group fund has already said it is near collapse. Failing hedge funds could be another hit to major banks, who have lent huge amounts of money to the funds.
 
Can't help but wonder if there will be a Bear Stearns come Monday.
The head of my group and my direct manager were in the same situation some time ago. The head of my group was a trader at Yomiuri Bank and my manager was working at LTCM since the early beginnings. We were speculating that something is going to happen over the weekend and by early next week, BSC is going to be history.

I have been through rough situations (at Bankers Trust the stock went from 130 in June to 43 in October) but this was really hard... and the traders, didn't make any easier, I wouldn't eitheri if I had the opportinity.

There was an article on Bloomberg talking about te price of the Bear Puts over the last couple of days. The March 25 Puts went from $0.05 on Wed to $.30 on Thursday to $4.10 on Friday... 70 fold... and the volume went through the roof with an ivol over 300 at some point. Talking about wild rides!!!
 
I was working for Lehman Bros. when Drexel went out of business at the end of the junk bond era. What shocked me then was the speed of the collapse. In December they handed out nice big fat bonuses and the world was fine and in the Spring they went out of business. By the time Drexel hit the headlines, it was over in a week and Bear looks to be heading off at the same pace.

The difference is Bear being in the fixed income/mortgage space has an ally in the Fed as they have an interest in seeing this resolved while Drexel was viewed more as a parasite feeding on weak American corporations and not a useful member of the club.
 
I agree with Andy that in times like this, there is little that can be achieved by what people say.

However saying the wrong thing can have bad effects.
 
Some of my thougths

Would regulators approve a complete acquisition of Bear Sterns by a Chinese bank?
Well when it comes to M&A I don't think there are nationality issues -- if someone wants cash and is selling out, I don't think the regulators would have a problem.... Foreign acquisitions are not really that uncommon -- we live in 2008 where its one big world .... ABN Amro a large Dutch bank got consumed by "European friends", Heathrow is run by a consotorium lead by the Spanish, Air Italia is been taken over by Air France, and an Indian firm is bidding for Ford Land Rover....

and does anyone remember Schroders Salomon Smith Barney ??

Absolutely no way! Also given the current climate, it is so politically incorrect. Indeed, I am very sure no foreign banks/companies (which have strong tie with their governments) will ever bother to propose a complete acquisition of any US based investment firm. There are enough articles about this kind of news on WSJ; it pretty much reflects what the Congress feels about it.
Well once again, I don't think the governments would have a problem, its a private business matter... Pimco which manages assets of about 1.3 Trillion dollars (which is greater than the book value of lots of investment banks put together) reports to Munich !!!

I think that the S&P500 might delete BSC from the index ( bsc s weight is 6 bps of the SPX ) which
should push the price lower since indexers will have to sell all the bsc s positions
Okay again opinions differ,but I don't think that would happen.... Even after the famous week yesterday, Bear Stearns (a 85 yr old firm) remains a firm with $4 bln of Market Cap, with last reported equity valuation of over $11 bln, and last reported tangible assets worth $53bln... Compare that with some of other SP500 firms -- LEN (last reported total assets, 9 bln) and QLGC (last reported total assets < 1 bln !)

I'm trying to understand why the S&P 500 is down again...
I think the "fear factor" kind of reached new heights this Friday... The SP500 was down 2% (which is not really that much given the history since August -- I am sure we have seen atleast 5 when we dropped 2%) .... But I think the market sentiment is really down.... On this thread itself we have had thoughts like "Dow will go below 10000 level." and "Can't help but wonder if there will be a Bear Stearns come Monday." , "we were talking about Lehman as well."
-- I think they pretty much reflect how people are feeling


SP, how is the mood like inside Bear ?
Well it has definitely not another day at business -- I guess everyone was happy that the day ended and we have the weekend !!!

If we were to believe what has been said -- I think Bear Stearns could be the first firm in the history to be affected this much by rumors -- or rather rumors turning true like a self proclaimed prophecy ...

Well I really have to say that I am happy to have seen this Friday -- I may have lived through history... Also it stuck to me that stuff of this magnitude can happen and being young and stupid (unlike Gus and Alain) it stuck me for the stuff happens fast -- there is always the risk of blow up -- there is no risk neutral world (the world is definitely not normally distributed).... I guess the worst part of it all is that no one knows who makes this stuff happen, when will he do it or with magnitude
 
Well when it comes to M&A I don't think there are nationality issues -- if someone wants cash and is selling out, I don't think the regulators would have a problem.... Foreign acquisitions are not really that uncommon -- we live in 2008 where its one big world .... ABN Amro a large Dutch bank got consumed by "European friends", Heathrow is run by a consotorium lead by the Spanish, Air Italia is been taken over by Air France, and an Indian firm is bidding for Ford Land Rover....
...
Well once again, I don't think the governments would have a problem, its a private business matter... Pimco which manages assets of about 1.3 Trillion dollars (which is greater than the book value of lots of investment banks put together) reports to Munich !!!

I think you are being a little naive. These are European companies digesting other european companies or a German company digesting an american company. We are talking about a chines bank, any chinese bank which has huge ties to the chines government, taking over an american bank. It would be great for shareholders because they would have to pay an interesting premium on whatever little value Bear could have at that moment but I'm incredulous. It could happen but regulators are an interesting bunch.
Okay again opinions differ,but I don't think that would happen.... Even after the famous week yesterday, Bear Stearns (a 85 yr old firm) remains a firm with $4 bln of Market Cap, with last reported equity valuation of over $11 bln, and last reported tangible assets worth $53bln...
and last reported Wednesday or Thursday, BSC didn't have liquidity problems... draw your own conclusion.
 
I think you are being a little naive.

probably, but bloomberg says it come down to a neighbour in need is a neighbour indeed kind of situation...


and last reported Wednesday or Thursday, BSC didn't have liquidity problems... draw your own conclusion.


I was refering to official SEC filings but I am sure that can be settled on Monday
 
Holy cows,
It's not $20 a share but rather $2, which valuates Bear at 230M
J.P. Morgan Chase agreed to buy Bear Stearns for $2 a share in a stock-swap transaction, people familiar with the matter say. J.P. Morgan will exchange 0.05473 shares of its common stock per one share of Bear Stearns stock. Both boards have approved the transaction.
Indeed, the Fed is taking the extraordinary step of providing special financing in connection with this transaction. The Fed has agreed to fund up to $30 billion of Bear Stearns' less liquid assets.
The deal values Bear Stearns at just $236 million, based on the number of Bear shares outstanding as of Feb. 16. At the end of Friday, Bear's stock-market value was about $3.54 billion.
J.P. Morgan to Buy Bear Stearns - WSJ.com

Looks like it's a done deal
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ar0QxIGdOnWI&refer=home
 
JPM definitely got a bargain. Even BSC's headquarter is worth around 1.3bln....
 
Looks like a shotgun wedding orchestrated by the Feds:

People close to the situation said the Fed and Treasury pressed for a deal before the opening of Asian markets on Monday morning because they wanted to stave off a run on other US and European banks.

(In the FT)


Probably the days of both unfettered financial markets and ever-more exotic financial products are coming to an end, and financial markets will be more tightly regulated and circumscribed now. You can draw your own conclusions about its implications for the need for quant work. But let's wait till the dust settles....
 
FYI attached is the PDF describing the merger to investors.
 

Attachments

  • JPM-BSC Merger Presentation.pdf
    43.8 KB · Views: 46
Back
Top