I don't think anyone is looking at this as an attack on the school. I never had an issue with people debating the ranking or methodology. The issue came about when personal attacks were made. Baruch came in 5th, not 1st or 2nd. People need to relax. I don't think it is inconceivable that Baruch could be the 5th best. How much difference is there really between 5th and 6th (which was 2 or 3 schools, tied)?